2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an original lab-scale filtration strategy for the prediction of microfiltration performance: Application to orange juice clarification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Steady-state fluxes (flux decay was observed for the three suspensions, followed by a pseudo-equilibrium of the flux) of 80 L.h -1 .m -2 , 30 L.h -1 .m -2 and 24 L.h -1 .m -2 were obtained for grapefruit juice, Red and Seed Extracts, respectively. These different flux values are in line with permeate flux values reported during microfiltration of citrus fruit juices (20 -80 L.h -1 .m -2 [57,58]) and winery byproducts (35 L.h -1 .m -2 [38,59]).…”
Section: Comparison With Conventional Cross-flow Filtration Using Side-stream Membranessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Steady-state fluxes (flux decay was observed for the three suspensions, followed by a pseudo-equilibrium of the flux) of 80 L.h -1 .m -2 , 30 L.h -1 .m -2 and 24 L.h -1 .m -2 were obtained for grapefruit juice, Red and Seed Extracts, respectively. These different flux values are in line with permeate flux values reported during microfiltration of citrus fruit juices (20 -80 L.h -1 .m -2 [57,58]) and winery byproducts (35 L.h -1 .m -2 [38,59]).…”
Section: Comparison With Conventional Cross-flow Filtration Using Side-stream Membranessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Indeed, this filtration configuration remains the most used for fruit juices microfiltration [2,[16][17][18][19][20]. Cross-flow filtration experiments were performed under batch mode concentration (until VRR 2), using operating conditions generally used when dealing with fruit-based suspensions microfiltration (0.1 µm inorganic tubular membranes, constant pressure of 1.5 bar [2,16,18,57]). The cross-flow velocity in each membrane and in the loop tubes (with diameter close to the membrane one) was around 5 m.s -1 , corresponding to a Reynolds number and a membrane shear rate of 7 300 and 22 000 s -1 , respectively (turbulent flow) ( [57]).…”
Section: Comparison With Conventional Cross-flow Filtration Using Side-stream Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit apparent viscosity for a shear rate of 1000 s -1 was chosen to compare concentrates. Indeed, this value is close to that evaluated on the membrane surface in the CMF system (Dahdouh et al, 2015).…”
Section: Rheological Propertiessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…To the authors' knowledge, even if the technological productivity of fruit juice microfiltration has been well addressed in many studies, very few works focus on the development of efficient tools to evaluate and to predict the fouling propensity of fruit juices (Dahdouh et al, 2016a(Dahdouh et al, , 2015a(Dahdouh et al, , 2015b, while such tool is investigated for other beverages. For example for wine filtration, the filter bomb, a laboratory-scale filtration device, is often used for optimising and predicting wine assisted-filtration and constitutes a relevant instrument to orientate the choice of the filtration adjuvant (Dubourdieu et al, 1976;Matteson, 2017;Breniaux et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%