2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12993-015-0067-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of behavioral parameters and ERPs in a novel-target visual detection paradigm in children, adolescents and young adults

Abstract: BackgroundThe present study analyzes the development of ERPs related to the process of selecting targets based on their novelty.MethodsOne hundred and sixty-seven subjects from 6 to 26 years old were recorded with 30 electrodes during a visual target novelty paradigm.ResultsBehavioral results showed good performance in children that improved with age: a decrease in RTs and errors and an increase in the d′ sensitivity parameter with age were obtained. In addition, the C response bias parameter evolved from a co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to control within group variation of electrophysiological measures we followed current guidelines (Picton et al, 2000 ). Age in particular influences many features in the EEG, resulting also in prominent maturational changes of ERP amplitudes and latencies (Davies et al, 2004 ; Wiersema et al, 2007 ; Brydges et al, 2013 ; Rojas-Benjumea et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to control within group variation of electrophysiological measures we followed current guidelines (Picton et al, 2000 ). Age in particular influences many features in the EEG, resulting also in prominent maturational changes of ERP amplitudes and latencies (Davies et al, 2004 ; Wiersema et al, 2007 ; Brydges et al, 2013 ; Rojas-Benjumea et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, only one study to date appears to have examined development of P300/P3a using visual stimuli in a three‐stimulus oddball task (Stige et al, ; but see Rojas‐Benjumea, Sauqué‐Poggio, Barriga‐Paulino, Rodríguez‐Martínez, & Gómez, , who used a two‐stimulus task with visual stimuli). Stige et al () examined visual P3a and P3b in children (6–15 years) and adults.…”
Section: Development Of Novelty Processing and The P3a Subcomponentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different psychological measures of the subjects were independently recorded. These were the mean reaction time (RT) of the visual oddball task (for more detail Rojas-Benjumea et al, 2015); Working Memory Test Battery for Children ( WMTBC; Pickering and Gathercole, 2001) with its subtests (Phonological Loop (PL), Visuospatial Sketchpad (VSS) and Central Executive (CE)) (for more detail Gómez et al, 2018). It should be noted that there are some missing values (Table 1) due to some subjects did not complete some of the tasks or did not return another day to finish the assessment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%