2014
DOI: 10.7567/jjap.53.02be07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of bifacial inverted polymer solar cells using a conductivity-controlled transparent PEDOT:PSS and a striped Au electrode on the hole collection side

Abstract: An inverted bifacial polymer solar cell was developed using a conductivity-controlled transparent PEDOT:PSS as a hole collection layer and a striped Au electrode with a large open aperture ratio (Rap) as a hole collection electrode. We investigated the performance of the device by varying the inter-electrode distance of the striped Au electrode and the sheet resistance of the PEDOT:PSS film.The device using Clevios P (PEDOT:PSS) showed a maximum electric output (P w ) in the R ap range of 50 to 65 %. When alco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the bifacial inverted polymer solar cell with a 200 nm thick PCBM:P3HT layer was irradiated from the ITO side, it showed a short-circuit photocurrent ( I sc ) of 7.75 mA, open-circuit voltage ( V oc ) of 0.55 V, FF of 0.54, and maximum electric output ( P w ) of 2.29 mW. In contrast, a monofacial inverted polymer solar cell using an Au plate electrode showed I sc = 7.67 mA, V oc = 0.57 V, FF = 0.61, and P w = 2.67 mW . That is, when irradiated from the front ITO electrode, the bifacial cell containing PEDOT:PSS (Clevios P) with a sheet resistance of (1.5 ± 0.5) × 10 5 Ω sq – 1 showed a slightly lower P w compared with that of the monofacial cell.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When the bifacial inverted polymer solar cell with a 200 nm thick PCBM:P3HT layer was irradiated from the ITO side, it showed a short-circuit photocurrent ( I sc ) of 7.75 mA, open-circuit voltage ( V oc ) of 0.55 V, FF of 0.54, and maximum electric output ( P w ) of 2.29 mW. In contrast, a monofacial inverted polymer solar cell using an Au plate electrode showed I sc = 7.67 mA, V oc = 0.57 V, FF = 0.61, and P w = 2.67 mW . That is, when irradiated from the front ITO electrode, the bifacial cell containing PEDOT:PSS (Clevios P) with a sheet resistance of (1.5 ± 0.5) × 10 5 Ω sq – 1 showed a slightly lower P w compared with that of the monofacial cell.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, when irradiated from the front ITO electrode, the bifacial cell containing PEDOT:PSS (Clevios P) with a sheet resistance of (1.5 ± 0.5) × 10 5 Ω sq – 1 showed a slightly lower P w compared with that of the monofacial cell. Thus, the PEDOT:PSS acted as a hole collection layer because the photoproduced holes were efficiently collected even by the striped Au electrodes . This implies that the built-in potential formed in the thickness direction of the PCBM:P3HT layer originates from the difference of Fermi levels of ZnO and PEDOT:PSS sandwiching the BHJ layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations