2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.115952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of boronate affinity-based magnetic composites in biological analysis: Advances and future prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 23 , 24 The performances of boronic acid based adsorbents are dependent on both the affinity ligands and the supporting materials. 25 Nanomaterial-supported boronic acid ligands exhibit several significant advantages including fast adsorption/desorption kinetics, pH-controlled capture/release process, and broad-spectrum affinity. 26 Because of its unique structural characteristics, DFNS can add one additional selectivity defined by molecular sizes in addition to the well-known boronic acid– cis -diol interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 23 , 24 The performances of boronic acid based adsorbents are dependent on both the affinity ligands and the supporting materials. 25 Nanomaterial-supported boronic acid ligands exhibit several significant advantages including fast adsorption/desorption kinetics, pH-controlled capture/release process, and broad-spectrum affinity. 26 Because of its unique structural characteristics, DFNS can add one additional selectivity defined by molecular sizes in addition to the well-known boronic acid– cis -diol interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it was reported that the interphase region, locating between polymer matrix and filled particles, facilitates the establishment of conductive networks. [23][24][25] Besides, the interphase region benefits shifting the percolation threshold to a lower concentration of filled particles, which undoubtedly affects the electrical conductivity of the nanocomposite. 26,27 Figure 1 displays a schematic illustration of nanoparticles which are surrounded with interphase regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32] reviewed the pros and cons of different chromatographic methods for glycoprotein and glycopeptide enrichment. The reviews published from 2016 onwards have focused on the application of different stationary phase materials (metal‐organic frameworks [MOFs] [33–36], covalent organic frameworks [37], magnetic nanoparticles [35, 3840], or monoliths [41]) for biomolecule enrichment including glycoproteins and glycopeptides. Qing et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%