2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.753.311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Boundary Misorientations During Grain Growth in Silicon Steels

Abstract: Changes in grain size, texture and misorientation distributions have been monitored during extensive normal grain growth in 3%Si steels. The boundary misorientation distributions deviate significantly from the Mackenzie relationship. Comparisons of correlated and uncorrelated distributions show large excesses of low angle boundaries. However, these are not a result of low energy boundaries being favoured during grain growth since the deviation diminishes as growth proceeds. The effect originates in the nucleat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Harase et al demonstrated that Goss grains have the highest frequencies of coincidence site lattice (CSL) boundaries in the matrix and claimed that selective growth can be explained by assuming the high mobility of CSL boundaries [7,8]. Hutchinson et al found the strong orientation dependence of Goss texture on the matrix texture in relation to CSL relationship [9]. On the other hand, Hayakawa and Szpunar assumed that high energy boundaries (misorientation angles between 20 to 45 degrees) are mobile instead of CSL boundaries [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harase et al demonstrated that Goss grains have the highest frequencies of coincidence site lattice (CSL) boundaries in the matrix and claimed that selective growth can be explained by assuming the high mobility of CSL boundaries [7,8]. Hutchinson et al found the strong orientation dependence of Goss texture on the matrix texture in relation to CSL relationship [9]. On the other hand, Hayakawa and Szpunar assumed that high energy boundaries (misorientation angles between 20 to 45 degrees) are mobile instead of CSL boundaries [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%