2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2018.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of CDK-targeted scoring functions for prediction of binding affinity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 summarizes recently published protein systems related to the development of machine learning models to predict binding affinity for a specific protein system. Table 2 shows the predictive performance of SAnDReS polynomial scoring functions and classical scoring functions [29,30,[35][36][37]. All these studies bring predictive performance comparisons of classical scoring functions against the targeted-scoring functions generated with SAnDReS for systems involving specific protein families and based on crystallographic structural data and experimental binding affinity information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 summarizes recently published protein systems related to the development of machine learning models to predict binding affinity for a specific protein system. Table 2 shows the predictive performance of SAnDReS polynomial scoring functions and classical scoring functions [29,30,[35][36][37]. All these studies bring predictive performance comparisons of classical scoring functions against the targeted-scoring functions generated with SAnDReS for systems involving specific protein families and based on crystallographic structural data and experimental binding affinity information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also see from the protein systems for which SAnDReS was tested so far, that its performance is not restricted to a specific enzymatic class or type of binding affinity. We have models for CDK [36], HIV-1 protease [35], 3dehydroquinate dehydratase [37] and coagulation factor Xa [29]. SAnDReS analyzed protein systems with experimental data such as K i [29,35,37], IC 50 [36] and ΔG [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These approaches are also adequate to assess the structural features responsible for the molecular recognition process. This type of integration of structural data and machine learning techniques has been successfully applied to a wide range of protein targets, such as cyclin-dependent kinases (EC 2.7.11.22) [33,34], proteases [35][36][37][38], and more recently to SARS-CoV-2 drug targets [39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches recognize the residues responsible for the binding affinity and reveal the most promising chemical moieties involved in inhibiting the protein targets. Also, several authors have built computational models to predict binding based on the atomic coordinates of protein-ligand complexes [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. These models rely heavily on computational methods and structural and protein-ligand binding affinity data to develop targeted scoring functions with superior predictive performance compared with classical scoring functions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%