2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-008-0942-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of classification models for early identification of persons at risk for persistent cognitive decline

Abstract: Both models lead to a substantial increase of the predictive value for persistent cognitive decline, that is from 4.0 % to 43.5 % and 30.0 %, and may identify to a large extent a different subsample of persons who are at risk for persistent cognitive decline. The developed classification trees could be useful for case-finding of persons at risk for future persistent cognitive decline who are therefore at risk for dementia, in a feasible and cost-effective manner.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with higher age, diabetes mellitus) and individuals at risk of a missed dementia diagnosis (e.g. living alone), based on risk factors readily available in primary care (van den Kommer et al , ; Pentzek et al , ; Kamat et al , ). Another area deserving further attention is the development of educational interventions with more emphasis on FPs' perceptions of their own suitability and capability to diagnose dementia, their skills to communicate the diagnosis and the importance of early diagnosis (Iliffe et al , ; Koch and Iliffe, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with higher age, diabetes mellitus) and individuals at risk of a missed dementia diagnosis (e.g. living alone), based on risk factors readily available in primary care (van den Kommer et al , ; Pentzek et al , ; Kamat et al , ). Another area deserving further attention is the development of educational interventions with more emphasis on FPs' perceptions of their own suitability and capability to diagnose dementia, their skills to communicate the diagnosis and the importance of early diagnosis (Iliffe et al , ; Koch and Iliffe, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional covariates derived from LASA data were highest education level, type of housing, partner status, multimorbidity, persistent cognitive decline, depressive symptoms, and interview mode (supplementary texts available from authors). A dichotomous variable distinguished Period 2 from Period 1, the latter of which was the reference category.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We restricted both samples to dementia-free participants [14, 15] aged 65 and older at baseline with valid vitamin D assessment and ≥2 cognitive assessments. In the CHS, dementia status was adjudicated according to the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke/Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria [14] whereas in the LASA probable dementia (persistent cognitive decline of more than two standard deviations (SD) below the mean decline with continued decline during follow-up) was identified based on available data as previously described [15]. We also excluded those with baseline memory scores that precluded substantial decline defined as ≥1 SD decrease greater than the mean change score from baseline to final assessment [16] (scores <3 and <8 in the CHS and LASA respectively).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%