2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2013.6609504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of control model for intelligently controllable ankle-foot orthosis

Abstract: We have developed an intelligently controllable ankle-foot orthosis (i-AFO). In this paper, we formulated a new control method for the i-AFO. In the method the sensor system of the i-AFO estimates walking speed of user and decide optimal drop speed of foot at the duration between initial contact and foot flat. We conducted the pretest for eight healthy subjects to make a control rule for the drop speed. Then we conducted the modeling test for one patient to make an estimation rule for walking speed. Finally we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Power power source and one connected to a step-up chopper circuit to charge and has a power consumption of 0.05736 W. So the required energy consumption is 0.05837 Joule for one gait cycle, so that it can be said that the application of the AFO control system has low energy consumption. Several active or semi-active AFOs have been proposed by Adiputra et al, [15], Kikuchi et al, [17,18], and Van der Wilk, et al, [16]. Based on these four works, their power consumption was more than 15 W. Compared to the existing device, the power consumption of the existing product is much less than the previous work.…”
Section: Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power power source and one connected to a step-up chopper circuit to charge and has a power consumption of 0.05736 W. So the required energy consumption is 0.05837 Joule for one gait cycle, so that it can be said that the application of the AFO control system has low energy consumption. Several active or semi-active AFOs have been proposed by Adiputra et al, [15], Kikuchi et al, [17,18], and Van der Wilk, et al, [16]. Based on these four works, their power consumption was more than 15 W. Compared to the existing device, the power consumption of the existing product is much less than the previous work.…”
Section: Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The passive AFO with magnetorheological (MR) brake shows similar configuration to active AFO with electric motor actuator. The MR brake or electric motor can be placed directly into the joint [9] or attached to some linkage mechanism first for torque amplification [15]. Of course, placing the MR brake directly is very simple to be done, but the torque achievement is not comparable with the robot AFO that uses linkage mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, placing the MR brake directly is very simple to be done, but the torque achievement is not comparable with the robot AFO that uses linkage mechanism. Study in [9] shows 2 Nm braking torque with direct placement configuration, while study in [15] shows 11 Nm braking torque with linkage configuration. Pneumatic powered AFO can offers high torque achievement (reported to be 23 Nm) [10], however, the compressed air tank is necessary for the movement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%