2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of densification-resistant castable porous structures from in situ mullite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
22
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing to the other SAS grades, MS particles have a much lower internal mesoporosity (IP = 10.7 %) and specific surface area. Due to this, its reduces the amount of voids amongst particles at the compacting step 1,6,8,48 . During the initial heating, no significant densification was observed up to 1000ºC (Fig.…”
Section: Samples Sintered At 1100ºcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Comparing to the other SAS grades, MS particles have a much lower internal mesoporosity (IP = 10.7 %) and specific surface area. Due to this, its reduces the amount of voids amongst particles at the compacting step 1,6,8,48 . During the initial heating, no significant densification was observed up to 1000ºC (Fig.…”
Section: Samples Sintered At 1100ºcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1d) particles are spherical, dense and individualized and their broad particle size distribution ranges from 50 to 500 nm. They are obtained as a precipitated by-product during the production of elemental silicon and are widely used in civil construction for enhancing the packing of high performance concrete, and in refractories for the production of mullitebased bricks and castables 1,7,8,15,38,39,48,49 . After physical characterization, the SAS particles were combined with calcined alumina to produce in situ mullite dense parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations