1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1998.tb04743.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Early Infection Structures of Puccinia recondita f. sp. tritici in Non‐host Cereal Species

Abstract: The development of infection structures, derived from urediospores of Puccinia recondita f.sp. trilici in nearisogenic lines of susceptible and resistant wheat, and in non-hosts (viz. maize, oat, sorghum and barley), was examined by fluorescence microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The infection structure formation on and in five cereal species follows a similar pattern. In sorghum, fungal development is arrested at the stage of substomatal vesicle formation, while, in maize, most fungal structur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those authors have studied the infection process of P. triticinia on susceptible (Thatcher) and resistant wheat lines (RL6040 which contains the Lr19 leaf rust resistance gene and RL6043 which contains the Lr21 leaf rust resistance gene) of wheat and no significant differences were observed between the three lines during these early infection events. Moreover, very similar results were obtained during P. triticinia infection of nonhost species such as maize, oat, sorghum, and barley [ 39 ]. Based on these studies, it is likely that the growth of the two races of P. triticinia used on RL6003 in this study invoke very similar responses during the early infection stages as that of the P. triticinia races used by Hu and Rijkenberg on other resistant wheat lines [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Those authors have studied the infection process of P. triticinia on susceptible (Thatcher) and resistant wheat lines (RL6040 which contains the Lr19 leaf rust resistance gene and RL6043 which contains the Lr21 leaf rust resistance gene) of wheat and no significant differences were observed between the three lines during these early infection events. Moreover, very similar results were obtained during P. triticinia infection of nonhost species such as maize, oat, sorghum, and barley [ 39 ]. Based on these studies, it is likely that the growth of the two races of P. triticinia used on RL6003 in this study invoke very similar responses during the early infection stages as that of the P. triticinia races used by Hu and Rijkenberg on other resistant wheat lines [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In a similar investigation of Puccinia recondita sp. tritici in non-host species, Hu and Rijkenberg (1998) were also unable to detect fungal development after substomatal vesicle formation in sorghum. In addition, only fragments of hyphal structures were observed, and the pathogen had no progression in R3 genotype at 24 hai, at the same time-point A. psidii produced haustorium in S4 plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In general, the stages of rust infection can be categorized into temporal phases corresponding to fungal development in which plants recognize specialized structures and activate defense responses ( Hu and Rijkenberg, 1998 ). Therefore, light microscopy analysis can be a useful method to elucidate the timeframe in which the pathogen growth ceases in resistant plants ( Hu and Rijkenberg, 1998 ; Xavier et al, 2001 ; Ayliffe et al, 2011 ; Zhang et al, 2011 ) and progress in susceptible tissues. We noticed that MF1 urediniospores germinated at 3 hai and facilitated appressorium formation at 6 hai in both R3 and S4 genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…defense responses (Hu and Rijkenberg, 1998). Therefore, light microscopy analysis can be a useful method to elucidate the timeframe in which the pathogen growth ceases in resistant plants (Hu and Rijkenberg, 1998;Xavier et al, 2001;Ayliffe et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2011) and progress in susceptible tissues. We noticed that MF1 urediniospores germinated at 3 hai and facilitated appressorium formation at 6 hai in both R3 and S4 genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%