1983
DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.19.3.322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of early vocal behaviors and interactions in Down's syndrome and nonhandicapped infant–mother pairs.

Abstract: ^Reque^foTreprints should be sent to J. Berger, Hester ficulties m W have their ori g? ns in the earl y Adrian Research Centre, University of Manchester, mother-infant interaction, either as a result Manchester, England, M13 9PL. of an impairment to the infant's signaling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
36
0
4

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings appear to support the notion espoused by Tannock (1988) and others that although the mother-child interactions of children with DS may be quantitatively different in some regards than the mother-child interactions of TD children, these differences are not necessarily maladaptive as has been suggested by earlier researchers (Berger and Cunningham 1984;Mahoney and Powell 1988). In this case, differences in the occurrence of communication breakdowns did exist between the groups, but the ability to eventually resolve breakdowns, which may be viewed as a measure of communicative effectiveness, did not.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These findings appear to support the notion espoused by Tannock (1988) and others that although the mother-child interactions of children with DS may be quantitatively different in some regards than the mother-child interactions of TD children, these differences are not necessarily maladaptive as has been suggested by earlier researchers (Berger and Cunningham 1984;Mahoney and Powell 1988). In this case, differences in the occurrence of communication breakdowns did exist between the groups, but the ability to eventually resolve breakdowns, which may be viewed as a measure of communicative effectiveness, did not.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Major findings concern directiveness, which differentiates mothers of children with MR in general, and mothers of children with DS in particular, from mothers of typically developing children (Beeghly & Cicchetti, 1987;Cielinski et al, 1995;Landry & Chapieski, 1989;Marfo et al, 1998). In most cases, though not all, this directive attitude has been associated with intrusiveness and with a lack of positivity and sensitivity (Berger & Cunningham, 1983). However, when trying to study the relation between maternal directiveness and intrusiveness, investigators have often attributed to the former an adaptive and functional role (Cielinski et al 1995;Crawley & Spiker 1983;Marfo, 1990).…”
Section: Mother-child Interaction In Children With Down Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences include more "vocal clashing" in "proto-conversations" of infancy, suggesting that the rhythm of turntaking exchanges is disrupted (Berger & Cunningham, 1983); maternal speech that is produced more rapidly and includes a higher proportion of nouns, shorter utterances, more imperatives, and more grammatically incomplete sentences (Buckholt, Rutherford, & Goldberg, 1978;Buium, Rynders, & Turnure, 1974); and mother-child interactions that are primarily mother-directed (Cardoso-Martins & Mervis, 1985). Although these fi ndings suggest that the input to children with Down syndrome may be less than optimal in terms of creating an enriched environment for learning to talk, Rosenberg and Abbeduto (1993) note that the majority of investigations of input to children with learning disabilities are plagued by methodological fl aws.…”
Section: Language Learning Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%