2015
DOI: 10.15390/eb.2015.1507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Elementary 6th and 7th Grade Students’ Views about Scientific Model and Modeling throughout a Summer Science Camp

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same situation was observed on the student level [53]. There are studies in the literature confirming an increase of understandings to some extent in terms of the evidence-based and tentative characteristics of scientific knowledge [76]. Although there are various and concurrent activities implemented together with manipulative interventions, there are also studies reporting that the development of students' understanding, regarding the tentative and evidence-based characteristics of scientific knowledge, is more difficult [77].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The same situation was observed on the student level [53]. There are studies in the literature confirming an increase of understandings to some extent in terms of the evidence-based and tentative characteristics of scientific knowledge [76]. Although there are various and concurrent activities implemented together with manipulative interventions, there are also studies reporting that the development of students' understanding, regarding the tentative and evidence-based characteristics of scientific knowledge, is more difficult [77].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…At its core, the fundamental skill of scientific thinking lies in coordinating theories and evidence (Kuhn, 1989(Kuhn, , 2002Kuhn et al, 2008;Kuhn & Pearsall, 2000). Some researchers further delineate the components of scientific thinking, including comparison and classification (Kuhn & Pearsall, 2000), reasoning and explanation (Dunbar & Klahr, 2012;Klahr et al, 2019;Murtonen & Salmento, 2019), model and modeling (Coll et al, 2005;Harrison & Treagust, 2000;Metin & Leblebicioğlu, 2015), argumentation (Asmoro et al, 2021;Kuhn, 1993Kuhn, , 2010, and critical thinking (Azar, 2010;Murtonen & Salmento, 2019). Expanding upon Shulman's foundational work, the conception and model of PCK have been refined, translated, and expanded by different scholars (e.g., Geddis et al, 1993;Magnusson et al, 1999;Marks, 1990;Park & Oliver, 2008).…”
Section: Research Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At elementary level, most articles have focused on creative, tentative, empirical, and subjective constructs of NOS (i.e. Akerson et al 2014;Cakici and Bayir 2012;Abd-El-Khalick, Masters and Akerson 2015;Quigley, Pongsanon, and Akerson 2010), reporting that, in general, students tend to hold naïve views about this NOS tenets (Cakici and Bayir 2012;Khishfe 2008;Khishfe and Abd-El-Khalick 2002;Metin and Leblebicioğlu 2015), even at earlier stages of the educational system (Akerson and Donnely 2010;Akerson et al 2014).…”
Section: Studies On Views Of the Nature Of Science Among Elementary S...mentioning
confidence: 99%