Seafood Processing by-Products 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9590-1_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Functional Materials from Seafood By-products by Membrane Separation Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 118 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in information depicted in Table 2, most of the protein was obtained during the pH shifting process; the least efficient treatment was 42.2%, below the 69% reported by Lee et al (2014), which in turn was lower than the average depicted in Table 2 (71.6%). The same authors tested a pretreatment process of micro (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF), which is different indeed to pH shifting.…”
Section: Protein Precipitation From Wash-watermentioning
confidence: 79%
“…As can be seen in information depicted in Table 2, most of the protein was obtained during the pH shifting process; the least efficient treatment was 42.2%, below the 69% reported by Lee et al (2014), which in turn was lower than the average depicted in Table 2 (71.6%). The same authors tested a pretreatment process of micro (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF), which is different indeed to pH shifting.…”
Section: Protein Precipitation From Wash-watermentioning
confidence: 79%