“…Previous studies have tested the efficacy of balance performance by using various force platforms including the Vicon Systems [ 9 , 11 , 20 ], Musgrave™ pedobarographs [ 10 , 13 , 14 ], footprint pressure plate systems [ 13 , 14 ], zebris [ 5 ], MatScan and T-Scan II computerized occlusal analysis systems [ 9 ], scanograms [ 20 ], Berg Balance Scale [ 22 ], and photogrammetry and mechanical electric elevation treatment tables [ 23 ]. In some studies, static posture was measured using tape measurements [ 5 , 19 , 21 ], goniometers [ 16 ], video recording [ 20 ], palpation meter inclinometers, and bubble inclinometers [ 21 ]. From ten articles using reflective markers [ 2 , 3 , 7 , 8 , 11 , 12 , 19 , 20 , 23 ], only two mentioned the total number of reflective markers used [ 11 , 12 ]; however, five articles mentioned the anatomical landmarks used for marker placement, such as the tibial tubercles (ankle and subtalar joints at the foot) [ 2 ]; pelvis, thighs, shanks, and feet (anterior and posterior regions for multisegment recordings) [ 3 , 20 ]; thigh, foot, pelvis, anterior-posterior (AP) iliac spines and iliac crest, greater lateral trochanter, medial-lateral (ML) epicondyles and malleoli, head of first and fifth metatarsals at the feet, and ankle [ 11 ]; and medial malleolus, medial femoral condyle and major trochanter for hips, and knees and ankles [ 16 ].…”