2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2006.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of glass–ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Characterisation, proliferation of human osteoblasts and nodule formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
195
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
195
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to providing excellent in vitro bioactivity [14,43,94,109,110,115], cell biology behavior [15,105,114,118,119] and favorable mechanical properties [99,102,105], bioactive glassceramic scaffolds have shown superior in vivo behavior (e.g., bone formation, mineralization, higher interfacial strength between implant and bone) compared to the glass in particulate form [113] or compared to other bioactive materials (HA, tricalcium phosphate) [52].…”
Section: Bioactive Glass Based Glass-ceramic Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to providing excellent in vitro bioactivity [14,43,94,109,110,115], cell biology behavior [15,105,114,118,119] and favorable mechanical properties [99,102,105], bioactive glassceramic scaffolds have shown superior in vivo behavior (e.g., bone formation, mineralization, higher interfacial strength between implant and bone) compared to the glass in particulate form [113] or compared to other bioactive materials (HA, tricalcium phosphate) [52].…”
Section: Bioactive Glass Based Glass-ceramic Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments related to bone TE try to bridge this gap and overcome this problem by architectures and components carefully designed from comprehensive levels, i.e., from the macro-, meso-, micrometer down to the nanometer scale [101], including both multifunctional bioactive glass composite structures (see §3.2) and advanced bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds exhibiting oriented microstructures, controlled porosity and directional mechanical properties [99,[102][103][104][105], as discussed in the following paragraphs. Most studies have investigated mainly the mechanical properties, in vitro and cell biological behavior of glass-ceramic scaffolds [13][14][15]30,43,52,94,95,97,99,, as summarized in Table 1, and scaffolds with compressive strength [99,102] and elastic modulus values [99,105] in magnitudes far above that of cancellous bone and close to the lower limit of cortical bone have been realized. Fu et al [99] fabricated bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds with oriented (i.e., columnar and lamellar) microstructures and found that at an equivalent porosity of 55-60%, the columnar scaffolds had a compressive strength of 25 ± 3 MPa, compressive modulus of 1.2 GPa, and pore width of 90-110 µm, compared to values of 10 ± 2 MPa, 0.4 GPa, and 20-30 μm, respectively, for the lamellar scaffolds.…”
Section: Bioactive Glass Based Glass-ceramic Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These two ions have previously been used in TE for a number of different purposes, including as dopants in the production of hydroxycarbonated apatite ceramics 32 , incorporation into polymeric microspheres 33 and also doping in bioactive glasses 22,24,[34][35] . Magnesium can increase chondrocyte proliferation and redifferentiation [36][37] and zinc is involved in bone metabolism 38 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnesium can increase chondrocyte proliferation and redifferentiation [36][37] and zinc is involved in bone metabolism 38 . Moreover, both magnesium and zinc can improve osteoblast adhesion to scaffolds [39][40] and promote osteogenic differentiation 35,38,[41][42] . 43 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%