Development of Hand-Eye Dominance in Relation to Verbal Self-Regulation of Motor Behavior

Nagae, Seiji

doi:10.2307/1422574

Cited by 10 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Crossed eye/hand laterality has been related to alcohol dependence (Yüksel et al., ) and other mental disorders such as other addictions or schizophrenia (Dane et al., ; Giotakos, ), and a poorer outcome in neuropsychological test conditions in early childhood (Nagae, ). Conversely, other studies suggested that crossed patterns of lateralization also exert protective effects such as a better clinical outcome in patients with schizophrenia and a lower prevalence in children with learning disabilities (Connolly, ; Gorynia et al., ; Liu et al., ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Crossed Eye/Hand Laterality and Left‐Eyedness Predict a Positive 24‐Month Outcome in Alcohol‐Dependent Patients

Weinland

Mühle

Kornhuber

et al. 2019

Alcoholism Clin & Exp Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Available predictors of hospital readmission following withdrawal in alcohol-dependent patients are limited. However, such parameters are needed to optimize individualized treatment strategies. This study investigated whether crossed eye/hand laterality, eyedness, and handedness may predict outcomes in alcohol dependence.Methods: The prospective study included 200 early-abstinent alcohol-dependent inpatients (n[males] = 113, n[females] = 87) and 240 control subjects (n[males] = 133, n[females] = 107). We assessed eyedness and handedness using the hole-in-the-card and Shimizu tests and documented alcohol-related readmissions over 12 and 24 months.Results: Crossed eye/hand laterality and left-eyedness were associated with a reduced risk for alcohol-related readmission (12-month: odds ratios [OR] = 0.41, p = 0.008, OR = 0.42, p = 0.004; 24month: OR = 0.57, p = 0.097, OR = 0.47, p = 0.016), fewer median readmissions (12-month: 0 vs. 1, p = 0.005, 0 vs. 1, p = 0.005; 24-month: 1 vs. 2, p = 0.014, 1 vs. 2, p = 0.006), and more mean days to the first readmission (12-month: 270 vs. 209, p = 0.007, 269 vs. 207, p = 0.003; 24-month: 462 vs. 335, p = 0.039, 461 vs. 323, p = 0.005).They also interacted with treatment and alcohol drinking history to predict the outcome. In sex-specific analyses, most of these effects remained significant in males but not in females. Handedness alone did not significantly predict outcome. Moreover, the laterality markers did not significantly differ between alcohol-dependent patients and control subjects.Conclusions: Determining crossed eye/hand laterality and eyedness may help to individualize relapse prevention in the future. Both are easily accessible predictors of alcohol-related readmission following inpatient withdrawal treatment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Crossed Eye/Hand Laterality and Left‐Eyedness Predict a Positive 24‐Month Outcome in Alcohol‐Dependent Patients

Weinland

Mühle

Kornhuber

et al. 2019

Alcoholism Clin & Exp Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some studies have linked C-HELPs with specific cognitive disorders. For example, Porac & Coren (1976) found that the C-HELP was more prevalent in individuals manifesting a variety of behavioral disorders, and Nagae (1983) showed that C-HELP children performed significantly worse at verbal self-regulation of motor behavior, supporting the view that the functions of cerebral hemispheres in C-HELP children were more immature and linked with learning disabilities. However, a meta-analysis by Bourassa, MacManus & Bryden (1996) with 54,087 participants from 47 studies on hand-eye laterality did not find enough evidence to associate hand-eye laterality with learning and indicated the necessity of conducting more research in the field.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Could hand-eye laterality profiles affect sport performance? A systematic review

Moreno

Capdevila

Losilla

2022

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Laterality effects on sports performance have been a field of interest for the sports sciences, especially in asymmetrical sports, which require the preferential use of one side of the body. Some sports in particular involve the visual system and ocular laterality, due to the need to clearly focus on a dynamic object (ball, opponent, projectile, etc.). The relationship between manual and ocular laterality results in two perceptual-motor profiles, one where the dominant hand and eye are ipsilateral (uncrossed hand-eye laterality profile, UC-HELP), and the other where they are contralateral (crossed hand-eye laterality profile, C-HELP). Methodology A systematic review of the literature was carried out to determine the prevalence of hand-eye laterality profiles in the different sports modalities and their relationship with psychological factors and sports performance. Searches of PsycInfo, Medline, Scopus and grey literature identified 14 studies (2,759 participants) regarding hand-eye laterality in sports that met the eligibility criteria. Results Previous studies have estimated that between 10–30% of the general population exhibit a C-HELP, and 70–90% have an UC-HELP. The results of the reviewed studies indicate that in some sports the percentage of C-HELP is higher in regular and high-level athletes than in the normal population: golf (52.55%), soccer (53%), tennis (42%) and team sports (50.7%). In target sports (archery and shooting) athletes with an UC-HELP seem to have an advantage given the significant concentration of this profile in the highest performing populations (82.3%). In basketball, cricket and golf, the literature reviewed also reported biomechanical differences in the execution of some techniques between the two profiles. We did not find any study in our review that related hand-eye laterality with cognitive, tactical, or psychological aspects of athletes. Conclusions These results should be taken with great caution due to the potential bias linked to the methodologies used in the investigations, the heterogeneity in the assessment of hand-eye laterality, the few studies available on the subject and the indirect nature of many of the observed relationships between performance and laterality. For further investigation, we propose a standardized terminology and protocol of hand-eye laterality assessment in sports. The advancement in knowledge about hand-eye laterality profiles, along with the study of the relationship with psychological or tactical-sports patterns, can contribute to more effective development plans for athletes and can be a complement to talent detection.

show abstract

“…A response of right was assigned a score of + 1, a response of left was assigned a score of −1, and an either response was assigned a 0. This method of scoring incorporates not only the direction but also the strength of the handedness (Nagae, 1983). The mean degree of the hand dominance of subjects used in this experiment was as follows: right-handed males = 10.67 ( SD = 1.14), left-handed males = −8.67 ( SD = 1.84), right-handed females = 11.33 ( SD = 0.94), and left-handed females = −8.42 ( SD = 1.75).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Handedness and sex differences in selective interference of verbal and spatial information.

Nagae¹

1985

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this experiment was to investigate handedness and sex differences with regard to the way verbal and spatial information is coded in selective-interference tasks. Left- and right-handed males and females were required to recall both letters and their positions in a matrix under three different kinds of interpolated conditions: visual, auditory, and noninterpolated activities. The results indicated that the selective-interference effect differed in right- and left-handers, whereas there were no differences by sex. Identity information had a dual encoding for both handedness groups, but it was relatively more biased toward visual encoding in left-handers than in right-handers; position information, however, was predominantly visually encoded--and to the same extent--in both handedness groups. These findings were interpreted as supporting the view that the differences in coding manner of right- and left-handers are related to differences in their hemispheric specialization.

show abstract

Development of Hand-Eye Dominance in Relation to Verbal Self-Regulation of Motor Behavior

Cited by 10 publications

References 22 publications

Crossed Eye/Hand Laterality and Left‐Eyedness Predict a Positive 24‐Month Outcome in Alcohol‐Dependent Patients

Crossed Eye/Hand Laterality and Left‐Eyedness Predict a Positive 24‐Month Outcome in Alcohol‐Dependent Patients

Could hand-eye laterality profiles affect sport performance? A systematic review

Handedness and sex differences in selective interference of verbal and spatial information.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About