2021
DOI: 10.1177/0145482x211059190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of 4to24, a Transition Application for Parents of Students With Visual Impairments

Abstract: Introduction This article focuses on the development of 4to24, an informational app for parents of students with visual impairments, with emphasis on obtaining stakeholder input, developing content, and establishing content validity. The app provides information, resources, and activities to help students, ages 4–24 years, prepare for independence and employment as an adult. Method App design and content development involved multiple phases of iterative design and writing. Stakeholder input was obtained via an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SUS is a brief quantitative measure of perceived usability (Brooke, 1996) wherein participants rated their level of agreement for 10 items (e.g., “I felt very confident using the system”) on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Previous research conducted with various types of products supports the validity and reliability of the SUS (Bangor et al, 2008; Sauro, 2011). We generated total SUS scores for each participant using calculations provided by Brooke (1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The SUS is a brief quantitative measure of perceived usability (Brooke, 1996) wherein participants rated their level of agreement for 10 items (e.g., “I felt very confident using the system”) on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Previous research conducted with various types of products supports the validity and reliability of the SUS (Bangor et al, 2008; Sauro, 2011). We generated total SUS scores for each participant using calculations provided by Brooke (1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…At both time points, app SUS scores were above average (Sauro, 2011; Sauro & Lewis, 2012), indicating that participants felt that the app was user-friendly and intuitive. The SUS scores from the account setup survey demonstrated an upward trend for students compared to scores from our initial usability sessions with similar tasks (Antonelli et al, in press), perhaps due to the improvements made to the account setup process in response to user feedback. Logistical differences between the initial usability sessions and the field test could have also influenced SUS scores since initial sessions were moderated by researchers and involved only brief interactions with the app.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations