2020
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2020.579129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Identity in CHARGE Syndrome—A Case Study “I Know Who I Am”

Abstract: CHARGE Syndrome is a genetic syndrome with a recognized pattern of features, and involves extensive medical and physical challenges. It is recognized as the most common cause of congenital deafblindness. This case study focuses on the development of identity of individuals with CHARGE Syndrome which is of concern to individuals with CHARGE Syndrome, their parents and the various professionals that provide support and service. A review of the literature demonstrates that the vast majority of research regarding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As would be appropriate for children or individuals with reduced cognitive abilities, some studied involved legal representatives or next-of-kin to provide consent (Damen et al, 2021; de Vaan et al, 2020; Peltokorpi et al, 2020; Wolthuis et al, 2020). Several studies reported that informed written consent was obtained from deafblind participants, but the authors did not provide any details on how this was accomplished (Wahlqvist et al, 2020b; Wanka, 2020). The presentation of such procedural information would have been especially informative in a study that focused on participants that used signed or tactile communication techniques (Gabarró-López & Mesch, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As would be appropriate for children or individuals with reduced cognitive abilities, some studied involved legal representatives or next-of-kin to provide consent (Damen et al, 2021; de Vaan et al, 2020; Peltokorpi et al, 2020; Wolthuis et al, 2020). Several studies reported that informed written consent was obtained from deafblind participants, but the authors did not provide any details on how this was accomplished (Wahlqvist et al, 2020b; Wanka, 2020). The presentation of such procedural information would have been especially informative in a study that focused on participants that used signed or tactile communication techniques (Gabarró-López & Mesch, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%