1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1983.tb26862.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Immunological Capacity Under Germfree and Conventional Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, factors in human milk such as secretory component (36) and lipid (35) have been shown to inhibit lymphocyte responses in vitro, and these factors may begin to have a role in vivo at this age. However, a more likely explanation is that bottle-fed infants have a greater uptake of macromolecules from the gut than breast-fed infants, as the lack of protective antibodies from human milk in the bottle-fed infants allows increased absorption of potentially antigenic macromolecules from gut bacteria (37) and cow milk proteins (38). Certainly, the serum antibody responses of these bottle-fed infants to components of the normal gut flora are significantly greater than those of the breast-fed infants at this time (28) indicating greater exposure of the systemic immune system to antigens encountered in the gut.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, factors in human milk such as secretory component (36) and lipid (35) have been shown to inhibit lymphocyte responses in vitro, and these factors may begin to have a role in vivo at this age. However, a more likely explanation is that bottle-fed infants have a greater uptake of macromolecules from the gut than breast-fed infants, as the lack of protective antibodies from human milk in the bottle-fed infants allows increased absorption of potentially antigenic macromolecules from gut bacteria (37) and cow milk proteins (38). Certainly, the serum antibody responses of these bottle-fed infants to components of the normal gut flora are significantly greater than those of the breast-fed infants at this time (28) indicating greater exposure of the systemic immune system to antigens encountered in the gut.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some specific components of the intestinal microflora, especially lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, have been associated with beneficial effects for the host, such as: (1) promotion of gut maturation, (2) gut integrity, (3) antagonisms against pathogens, and (4) immune modulation (Carter and Pollard, 1971;Berg and Savage, 1975;Tlaskalova-Hogenova et al, 1980;Tlaskalova-Hogenova et al, 1983;Tlaskalova-Hogenova et al, 1994). In addition, the microflora seems to play a significant role in the maintenance of intestinal immune homeostasis and prevention of inflammation (Powrie, 1995).…”
Section: Modulation Of the Intestinal Microbial Community By Dietary mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38][39][40][41][42][43][44] We have shown that microbial colonization of animals living in germ-free conditions results in an increase in immunoglobulin levels, the production of specific antibodies, substantial changes in mucosal-associated lymphocyte tissues and cell populations, changes in migration patterns and increases in the systemic immunological capacity. 35,40,42,43 In the early postnatal period, components of the normal microbiota induce a transient physiological inflammatory response in the gut associated with enlargement of the mucosal-associated lymphatic tissue and increases in its cellularity. 39,45 The effect of microbial colonization on innate immune cells has been documented in our studies on the development of phagocytes, dendritic cells and intestinal epithelial cells.…”
Section: The Role Of the Microbiota In Postnatal Development Of Innatmentioning
confidence: 99%