2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.juogr.2014.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of innovative and efficient hydraulic fracturing numerical simulation model and parametric studies in unconventional naturally fractured reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to matrix permeability reduction with increasing net stress, propped and unpropped fracture permeability also decreases with increasing net stress (Schubarth et al, 1997;Miller et al, 2011;Ahn et al, 2014). Because fractures represent an important pathway for the movement of fluid through shales, this represents a significant potential source of injectivity and effective storativity reduction.…”
Section: Geologic Properties and Production Of Shalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to matrix permeability reduction with increasing net stress, propped and unpropped fracture permeability also decreases with increasing net stress (Schubarth et al, 1997;Miller et al, 2011;Ahn et al, 2014). Because fractures represent an important pathway for the movement of fluid through shales, this represents a significant potential source of injectivity and effective storativity reduction.…”
Section: Geologic Properties and Production Of Shalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic coordinates are used to represent hydraulic fracture network propagation and static coordinates to represent natural fractures that have not been activated. 23 The overall dynamic and static coordinates constitute the solution region (Figure 1). Natural fractures open and propagate in the process of fluid injection.…”
Section: Methods Of Fracture Net Work Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, based on the basic parameters shown in Table 3, the results calculated by Ahn et al 23 were used for comparison with the results of the proposed model in this paper (Figure 7). We observed that the calculation results of the proposed model were generally consistent with those of Ahn et al, 23 which verified the correctness of the model used to simulate the propagation of fracture networks. Figure 8 shows the geometric shape of a fracture network and fracture width profile calculated according to basic parameters listed in Table 1, and Figure 9 shows the pore pressure distribution of the reservoir matrix considering pressure-dependent filtration.…”
Section: Check the Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many examples in the literature of studies using different numerical methods to solve the problem of fracturing in brittle substances. These numerical methods include the finite difference method (FDM), 12 the boundary element method (BEM), 13,14 the discrete element method (DEM), 15,16 discrete fracture networks (DFNs), 17 the finite element method (FEM), 18–23 the extended finite element method (XFEM), 24 the numerical manifold method (NMM) 25, 26 and discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA) 27 . In addition, particular computer codes, for example, Universal Distinct Element Code (UDEC), 28 the FROCK code, 29 two‐dimensional (2D) particle flow code (PFC 2D ) 30 and rock failure process analysis (RFPA), 31 have been applied to model the failure mechanism of brittle materials such as rock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%