2016
DOI: 10.2298/abs151012063b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of insect-resistant cotton lines with targeted expression of insecticidal gene

Abstract: In order to address biosafety concerns regarding the constitutive expression of foreign genes in crops, we applied a strategy aimed at confining foreign gene expression in insect wounding sites of cotton. For this purpose, a plant expression construct was designed by cloning the AoPR1 promoter (pathogenesis-related protein gene isolated from Asparagus officinalis) upstream from the insecticidal gene cry1Ac. The Turkish cotton cultivar cv. STN-468 was transformed using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA44… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The knowledge about the choice and efficiency of a promoter is handy for researchers especially using new genome editing techniques like RNA interference and Crispr-Cas-9. The commercialized crop express insect or herbicide resistant gene(s) under the control of 35S CaMV; a widely used constitutive promoter (Ho et al 1999;Bakhsh et al 2016). There are different concerns about the use of virus based promoters in genetically modified crops (Ho et al 1999;Podevin and Du Jardin 2012;Khabbazi et al 2018) that provides impetus for the use of plant origin promoters in next generation genetically modified (GM) or non GM crops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge about the choice and efficiency of a promoter is handy for researchers especially using new genome editing techniques like RNA interference and Crispr-Cas-9. The commercialized crop express insect or herbicide resistant gene(s) under the control of 35S CaMV; a widely used constitutive promoter (Ho et al 1999;Bakhsh et al 2016). There are different concerns about the use of virus based promoters in genetically modified crops (Ho et al 1999;Podevin and Du Jardin 2012;Khabbazi et al 2018) that provides impetus for the use of plant origin promoters in next generation genetically modified (GM) or non GM crops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA-A genome of monopartite begomoviruses possesses a LIR sequence that functions as a bidirectional promoter, essential for replication and expression of the viral genes, C1 (replication associated protein) and V1 (coat protein) [19,20]. Recently, Cry1Ac endotoxin expression in plants has been driven by plant promoters including the rbcS [10,21], AoPR1 [22,23], ats1A [24,25], and maize ubiquitin-1 promoters [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These transgenic plants are becoming important components of integrated pest management worldwide (Kos et al 2009). According to the literature, use of 35S CaMV promoter has been the first choice of all researchers to express foreign protein genes constitutively in commercialized transgenic crops; however, the targeted expression of foreign gene proteins has immense significance in transgenic technology to address the concerns of unnecessary protein production, and to avoid extra metabolic burden on plants (Ahmed et al 2017;Bakhsh et al 2016). It has already been established that cry1 toxin shows efficacy against lepidopterans (Bravo et al 2007); however, there are very few reports about their efficacy against CPB (Yüceer and Kayım 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%