2006
DOI: 10.3758/bf03213907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of intuitive rules: Evaluating the application of the dual-system framework to understanding children’s intuitive reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings seem consistent with studies on saliency in perception research which show that attention tends to be directed, without the intention of the observer, towards certain features of a task20–22 either because they are perceptually salient or because they become salient to the individual due to his/her prior experience with similar problems 20 25. It is reasonable to suppose that some features in a clinical case, even when irrelevant to the present problem, would become salient for a physician who had previous patients with similar histories or when the clinical significance or potential seriousness of a certain finding is known.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Findings seem consistent with studies on saliency in perception research which show that attention tends to be directed, without the intention of the observer, towards certain features of a task20–22 either because they are perceptually salient or because they become salient to the individual due to his/her prior experience with similar problems 20 25. It is reasonable to suppose that some features in a clinical case, even when irrelevant to the present problem, would become salient for a physician who had previous patients with similar histories or when the clinical significance or potential seriousness of a certain finding is known.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Most strikingly, when frequency information was presented, children switched from a tendency to commit the fallacy to a tendency to avoid the fallacy, which did not happen in the case of adults, unless the relevance of probability information was specifically highlighted to them. Osman and Stavy (2006) discussed the role of bottom-up and top-down saliency in people's interpretation of tasks, where bottom-up saliency is based on the objective characteristics of presented stimuli, and top-down saliency is based on participants' knowledge of (and previous experiences with) the stimuli. Our findings suggest that there is a developmental shift from childhood to adulthood from a dominant reliance on bottom-up, to a dominant reliance on topdown saliency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skill-based reasoning acquired through instruction might act as a heuristic process but seems to differ from other heuristic processes in its relation to consciousness. Osman and Stavy [2006] contrasted skill-based automatic processes with implicit processes, arguing that people are aware of the procedures they apply in skill-based processes. Evans acknowledged that different types of heuristic processes relate to consciousness differently: 'it seems that there are implicit processes that were once conscious, others that were never conscious but deliver a product to consciousness, and still others that influence our behaviour without ever being conscious in any sense at all' [Evans, 2006a, p. 4].…”
Section: Opportunities For Dual-process Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%