2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12541-015-0185-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of lab-scale rock drill apparatus for testing performance of a drill bit

Abstract: This study experimentally validated the reliability of the lab-scale rock drill apparatus and investigated the effect of bit design factors on the performance of drilling. To test drilling efficiency of a drill bit, a testing system was designed and manufactured. Using the testing system, the drilling rates and specific energy of a conventional drill bit and newly proposed drill bit with different button arrangement were compared. The newly proposed model was tested to be superior in drilling performance than … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To predict the performance of the percussive drilling system, an analysis of the performance of the percussive drilling tool (e.g., DTH hammer), location of the drill button bit, and its effect on the subsequent fracturing of the rock is required. As there is no standard for button impact testing, researchers have conducted tests by building vertical or horizontal button test machines [12][13][14][15][16]. In this study, the test system shown in Figure 6 was used for quantitative analysis of the button impact.…”
Section: Drilling Performance With Buttonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To predict the performance of the percussive drilling system, an analysis of the performance of the percussive drilling tool (e.g., DTH hammer), location of the drill button bit, and its effect on the subsequent fracturing of the rock is required. As there is no standard for button impact testing, researchers have conducted tests by building vertical or horizontal button test machines [12][13][14][15][16]. In this study, the test system shown in Figure 6 was used for quantitative analysis of the button impact.…”
Section: Drilling Performance With Buttonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Song et al [1] proposed optimal design factors and range for top-hammer drill bit based on multiphase ow simulation and response surface methodology (RSM). Also, Song et al [8] designed a labscale testing system to test drilling performance of a drill bit and investigated the e ect of bit design factors on the performance of drilling. Kwon et al [9] validated the e ect of drill bit button arrangement on drilling e ciency through a piston percussion test using piston drop testing system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The operation of the hydraulic drifter co mprises propulsion (the hydraulic cy linder applies propulsion to the drifter to ensure that the drill shank is constantly in contact with the rock), impact (the hydraulic pump prov ides fluid pressure energy to the drifter; the impact piston reciprocally impacts the shank adapter; and the drill shank transfers the impact energy to the rock in the form of stress waves, thus causing the rock to rupture), gyration (the torque output by the hydraulic motor causes the drill bit to gyrate to a new position after each impact, and part of the cracked rock surface is removed), and flushing (the auxiliary water pu mp flushes the broken rock powder in the borehole) (Lin, 2014;Zou, 2017;Song, et al, 2015) (Fig . 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%