2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of macrofaunal communities on dredged material used for mudflat enhancement: a comparison of three beneficial use schemes after one year

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since even small differences in the median grain size and the fractions of medium sand and fine sand content are reflected in differences in the nematode communities (Vanaverbeke et al, 2002), it seems unlikely that nematode communities would remain unchanged during such a long period in this very dynamic environment. Bolam et al (2006) summarised earlier discussions (see Bolam and Whomersley, 2003;Bolam and Whomersley, 2005;Schratzberger et al, 2006) on reference sites, defined as pre-impact situations or a non-impacted reference site. Although they studied the recolonisation of dredged material deposited in intertidal systems, their remarks are valid for the central depression as well: pre-impact situations are very different from the impacted situations (eg.…”
Section: Recovery Of Nematode Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since even small differences in the median grain size and the fractions of medium sand and fine sand content are reflected in differences in the nematode communities (Vanaverbeke et al, 2002), it seems unlikely that nematode communities would remain unchanged during such a long period in this very dynamic environment. Bolam et al (2006) summarised earlier discussions (see Bolam and Whomersley, 2003;Bolam and Whomersley, 2005;Schratzberger et al, 2006) on reference sites, defined as pre-impact situations or a non-impacted reference site. Although they studied the recolonisation of dredged material deposited in intertidal systems, their remarks are valid for the central depression as well: pre-impact situations are very different from the impacted situations (eg.…”
Section: Recovery Of Nematode Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides natural processes, anthropogenic factors influencing sedimentation are prominent in the estuary, among which dredging in the main channels to ensure access to the port of Antwerp and dumping of the dredged material to retain sediment within the estuary are the most important (Jeuken and Wang, 2010;Meire et al, 2005). Most of this dredged sediment is disposed of near shoals and tidal flats and can thus affect the intertidal ecosystem (Bolam and Whomersley, 2005;De Vriend et al, 2011;Zheng, 2015). The effects of sediment deposition on taxonomic diversity (Thrush et al, 2003), behaviour (Hohaia et al, 2014;Townsend et al, 2014), and ecosystem functioning (Larson and Sundbäck, 2012;Montserrat et al, 2011) have recently received considerable attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for use of these sandy media is their possible application for the establishment of clam fishery area. As for DS, it may be used as an additive to adjust the silt and clay content in practical use, because DS mainly consists of silt and clay (van Dolah et al, 1984;Bolam and Whomersley, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%