1984
DOI: 10.1002/ar.1092080112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of macrophages in the lungs of fetal rabbits, rats, and hamsters

Abstract: Fetal rabbits (days 13-32), rats (days 14-22), and hamsters (days 11-15) and selected postnatal animals were examined for pulmonary macrophages or their precursors in 2-micron sections stained by PAS-lead hematoxylin (all species), electron micrographs (rabbit and rat), and cytochemical incubations for acid phosphatase (rabbit and rat), aliesterase, and N-acetyl glucosaminidase (rabbits). All methods revealed macrophages in perinatal specimens. The appearance and distribution of these cells were compared in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AM, they are also consistent, however, with the possibility that the IM may, at least in part, be a resident lineage ofmononuclear phagocytes that is generally independent of a BM origin (196). To date, other analyses ofantigenic differences and similarities among the BM, IM, and AM have as yet to distinguish whether either or both of these possibilites are operational in the lung (14,15,20,154,197,198) in that the expression of surface antigens on mononuclear phagocytes may change as they further differentiate or mature or after they take up residency in different anatomical compartments (13,23,27,198,199).…”
Section: Pulmonary Interstitial Macrophagessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…AM, they are also consistent, however, with the possibility that the IM may, at least in part, be a resident lineage ofmononuclear phagocytes that is generally independent of a BM origin (196). To date, other analyses ofantigenic differences and similarities among the BM, IM, and AM have as yet to distinguish whether either or both of these possibilites are operational in the lung (14,15,20,154,197,198) in that the expression of surface antigens on mononuclear phagocytes may change as they further differentiate or mature or after they take up residency in different anatomical compartments (13,23,27,198,199).…”
Section: Pulmonary Interstitial Macrophagessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Perinatal lung maturity with respect to the MPS is reflected by the stage of differentiation of pulmonary macrophages and PIMs (Kauffman, 1980;Sorokin et al, 1984). Newborn lambs and those up to 3 months of age have alveolar macrophages with limited phagocytic and bactericidal capacity compared with adult sheep (Weiss et al, 1986).…”
Section: Postnatal Lung Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological studies suggested that embryonic lung macrophages derive from the yolk sac (Aguzzi et al, 2013;Hoeffel et al, 2012;Sorokin et al, 1984Sorokin et al, , 1992van Furth and Cohn, 1968), and subsequent immunohistochemical studies suggested that these fetal macrophages differentiated into interstitial macrophages, then to alveolar macrophages in the postnatal lung (Higashi et al, 1992;Hoeffel et al, 2012;Takahashi et al, 1989), which were then maintained by circulating monocytes with interstitial macrophages as putative intermediates. The role of interstitial macrophages as developmental intermediates was supported by observations that proliferation or replenishment of lung macrophages in the interstitial compartment often preceded that of the alveolar compartment following injury, depletion or explant culture (Bowden and Adamson, 1972;Bowden et al, 1969;Higashi et al, 1992;Landsman and Jung, 2007;Lichanska and Hume, 2000;Robinson, 1984;Takeya and Takahashi, 1992), and by ultrastructural and immunohistochemical studies suggesting that interstitial macrophages were intermediate in size and molecular phenotype between monocytes and alveolar macrophages (Cai et al, 2014;Ginhoux et al, 2010;Sebring and Lehnert, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%