2021
DOI: 10.1111/jace.18105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of mesoporous bioactive glass‐containing macroporous titanium for controlled release of antimicrobial drugs

Abstract: Biofilm-associated infections pose a serious threat to the long-term survival of metal-based bone implants, which can potentially be resolved by the controlled delivery of antimicrobial agents locally at the implant surface. Mesoporous bioactive glasses (BAGs) are multifunctional materials able to combine bone-bonding properties with such a drug release functionality. Here, we propose for the first time to modify a macroporous Ti implant material with an antimicrobial-releasing BAG phase. The feasibility of a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Systemic administration of antibiotics for the treatment of these infections is less effective and not sufficient to completely eradicate the formation of biofilm from the surface of implants as the resistance of bacteria inside a biofilm is a thousand-fold higher than planktonic bacteria [ 33 ]. Through our previous research and other works, it has been proven that localized drug delivery is more effective against the formation/treatment of a bacterial biofilm on an implant surface compared to systemic drug delivery [ 13 , 14 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. It is possible to control the rate of drug release by varying the concentration of the feed solution and the pore size of the silica diffusion barrier [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systemic administration of antibiotics for the treatment of these infections is less effective and not sufficient to completely eradicate the formation of biofilm from the surface of implants as the resistance of bacteria inside a biofilm is a thousand-fold higher than planktonic bacteria [ 33 ]. Through our previous research and other works, it has been proven that localized drug delivery is more effective against the formation/treatment of a bacterial biofilm on an implant surface compared to systemic drug delivery [ 13 , 14 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. It is possible to control the rate of drug release by varying the concentration of the feed solution and the pore size of the silica diffusion barrier [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is especially problematic in case of antimicrobial therapy as the exposure of microorganisms to sub-inhibitory concentrations, before biofilm eradication can lead to re-infection and AMR development. Recently, a drug-releasing Ti/BG system was reported by Kamarudin et al, where a mesoporous BG, contained within a microporous Ti structure, acted as a barrier for a more controlled release of chlorhexidine, an antiseptic used for treatment of peri-implantitis around dental implants [243]. In combination with a refillable internal reservoir, this composite allows fine-tuning the release of antimicrobial agents to therapeutic concentrations, i.e.…”
Section: Bioactive Glass Releasing Phytotherapeutic Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%