SAE Technical Paper Series 1995
DOI: 10.4271/950283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Methodology for Spray Impingement Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
271
1
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 423 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
271
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The above phenomena depend on the drop Weber number (e.g., Naber and Reitz, 1989). Recent improvements account for the formation and breakup of liquid films (Bai and Gosman, 1995;Stanton, et al 1998). …”
Section: Drop Collision Coalescence Drag and Wall Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above phenomena depend on the drop Weber number (e.g., Naber and Reitz, 1989). Recent improvements account for the formation and breakup of liquid films (Bai and Gosman, 1995;Stanton, et al 1998). …”
Section: Drop Collision Coalescence Drag and Wall Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the existing splashing models are in the spray field (reciprocating engines, gas turbines, spray cooling systems, inkjet printing, etc. ), such as the model of Bai & Gosman[1995],Trujillo et al [2000], Mundo et al[1995Mundo et al[ , 2001 and Han et al [2000]. However, since the application conditions of the models is far from SLD conditions, i.e., wall surface property, temperature, liquid water content (LWC), droplet sizes and velocities, in particular the flow structure and wall surface property, they cannot be used to predict the mass and momentum transports directly during SLD impingement.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regimes that an impinging droplet may undergo differently were identified as stick, spread, rebound, rebound with break-up, boiling-induced break-up, break-up, and splash (Bai and Gosman, 1995). A UWS spray wall interaction also cannot be avoided in most SCR applications due to insufficient entrainment, slow evaporation and thermolysis, and the inertia of the droplets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fuel spray wall interaction has been investigated for many years (Senda et al, 1994;Bai and Gosman, 1995;Stanton and Rutland, 1996). The regimes that an impinging droplet may undergo differently were identified as stick, spread, rebound, rebound with break-up, boiling-induced break-up, break-up, and splash (Bai and Gosman, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%