2004
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-4-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of microsatellite markers from an enriched genomic library for genetic analysis of melon (Cucumis meloL.)

Abstract: Background: Despite the great advances in genomic technology observed in several crop species, the availability of molecular tools such as microsatellite markers has been limited in melon (Cucumis melo L.) and cucurbit species. The development of microsatellite markers will have a major impact on genetic analysis and breeding of melon, especially on the generation of marker saturated genetic maps and implementation of marker assisted breeding programs. Genomic microsatellite enriched libraries can be an effici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 44 loci amplified a total of 202 alleles with a mean of 4.59 alleles per locus (Table S4); an allele number superior to that described by Aragão (2010), who analyzed 41 melon accessions using 17 SSR primers, also developed by Ritschel et al (2004), who amplified 41 alleles. This allele number is superior to that described by Kaçar et al (2012), who studied the genetic diversity of 81 melon genotypes of Turkey in comparison to 15 reference genotypes obtained in France.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 44 loci amplified a total of 202 alleles with a mean of 4.59 alleles per locus (Table S4); an allele number superior to that described by Aragão (2010), who analyzed 41 melon accessions using 17 SSR primers, also developed by Ritschel et al (2004), who amplified 41 alleles. This allele number is superior to that described by Kaçar et al (2012), who studied the genetic diversity of 81 melon genotypes of Turkey in comparison to 15 reference genotypes obtained in France.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Staub et al (2000) compared melon accessions of different botanical groups (Cantaloupensis, Inodorus, Conomon, and Flexuosus) using seven SSR polymorphic markers that amplified a total of 54 alleles. Besides, 93 alleles were detected in a study that evaluated the divergence of 40 melon accessions belonging to Cantaloupensis, Inodorus, and Conomon groups by 25 SSR markers (Ritschel et al, 2004). The number of alleles described herein was inferior to that found by Tzuri et al (2006), who evaluated 102 genotypes of various types of melon (Cantaloupe, Charentais, Honey Dew, Ananas, Galia, Inodorus, and Oriental melon) by PCR and electrophoresis on polyacrylamide gel, and amplified a total of 212 alleles using 48 SSR polymorphic primers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, cross-pollination rate in cultivated chayote may not be as high as assumed, since chayote is typically cultivated in home gardens and a small number of plants are used for seed source [11]. Reference [34] also reported low heterozygosity values (range 0.00 -0.50) in melon samples evaluated with a set of 25 microsatellites and mentioned possible favoring endogamy in cultivated populations. Pollination with self and/or among close relatives during domestication and cultivation of the species may have contributed to the observed low heterozygosity values.…”
Section: Low Heterozygosity Detected In Chayote Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One molecular marker that is widely used for this purpose is simple sequence repeats (SSR) or often called as microsatellites DNA (Hancock, 1999;Liu, Cantrell, McCarty, & Stewart, 2000). The advantage of this markers are co-dominant character, high level of polymorphic, easily to be repeated and stable (Ritschel et al, 2004) and the analysis could be conducted automatically (Schuelke, 2000). High variability of these markers allows accurate calculation to detect paternal contribution to the progeny produced (Ottewell, Donnellan, Moran, & Paton, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%