Development of Mobile Application for The Concept of Pattern Recognition in Computational Thinking for Mathematics Subject

Abdullah, Abdul Halim; Othman, Muhammad Asnawi; Ismail, Norulhuda; Rahman, Sharifah Nurarfah S. Abd; Mokhtar, Mahani; Zaid, Norasykin Mohd

doi:10.1109/tale48000.2019.9225910

Cited by 6 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There were many studies undertaken to eliminate the gap in CT (Sun et al, 2021b). As a consequence, many academics emphasise the need of including CT in the curriculum in regard to a 21st-century literacy at various education levels, starting from kindergarten to university (Abdullah et al, 2019;Jaipal-Jamani & Angeli, 2017;Nouri et al, 2020;Pei et al, 2018;Tasso et al, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Computational thinking in mathematics education: A systematic review

Subramaniam

Maat

Mahmud

2022

CJES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As a research area, computational thinking (CT) has gotten increased attention in mathematics education in the last decade. A study identifying patterns in CT research would be essential in understanding the technique for developing CT in mathematics and guiding future research attempts. As a result, the goal of this systematic literature review is to look at the learning methods promoting CT in mathematics lessons. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses standards were utilised to guarantee that this study was done systematically. The result shows that even though there are various types of learning tools that are most commonly used, the coding programming tool and robotic activities tool are the most user-friendly methods for encouraging CT in mathematics education. This literature review is intended to provide educators with a better understanding of learning tools in order to enhance CT, which may help transform education into something more creative and meaningful. Keywords: Computational thinking; education; learning tools; mathematics; systematic review

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Computational thinking in mathematics education: A systematic review

Subramaniam

Maat

Mahmud

2022

CJES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The fifth study reports the development and experimentation of an unnamed mobile application for fostering, in the Mathematics subject, the the concept of PR from CT [Abdullah et al 2019]. The mobile app offers multiple choice quizzes in different levels of difficulty on PR, as well as mini-games of finding pairs through cards showing different patterns.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The results show that, in computing education, PR is being approached predominantly using Softwares, featuring games [Guenaga 2021] or gamified quizzes [Abdullah et al 2019]/series of questions [Barrón-Estrada et al 2022]. Alternatively, there are efforts to approach PR using unplugged activities [Saxena et al 2020] and coding [Miller 2019].…”

Section: How Is Pattern Recognition Being Approached In Computing Edu...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Alternatively, there are efforts to approach PR using unplugged activities [Saxena et al 2020] and coding [Miller 2019]. The tools being used are mostly original tools that are presented in the study, as Patrony [Barrón-Estrada et al 2022], Lempel [Guenaga 2021] and an unnamed PR quizz app [Abdullah et al 2019]. Alternatively, there are efforts using LEGO bricks [Saxena et al 2020] and Scratch allied to robots [Miller 2019].…”

Section: How Is Pattern Recognition Being Approached In Computing Edu...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The assessment of PR in computing education is being done mostly through selfdeveloped resources [Barrón-Estrada et al 2022, Guenaga 2021, Abdullah et al 2019, Miller 2019], i.e. the authors of the papers are also the authors of the assessment resources used, which were developed specifically for the given experiment.…”

Section: How Is Pattern Recognition Being Assessed In Computing Educa...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Pattern Recognition in Computing Education: A Systematic Review

Junior

Silva

Cavalheiro

et al. 2022

Anais Do XXXIII Simpósio Brasileiro De Informática Na Educação (SBIE 2022)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a systematic literature review to investigate how pattern recognition has been approached in computing education. Pattern Recognition has long been an important concept among various areas, from cognitive psychology and neuroscience to machine learning and computer vision. Recently, it gained the attention of education, being associated with computational thinking. An old concept being revisited in a new context raises important questions on how it is being approached, how it is being assessed and if it is making use of previous contributions from the other fields that have been studying the concept. This work systematically reviews the literature to answer these questions on pattern recognition. It is found that, as other concepts related with computational thinking, it is rarely treated alone and when among others, few studies have pattern recognition as the main theme. The results also show that no standardized assessment method is used and contributions from other fields are barely mentioned.

show abstract