1991
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-137-5-1009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of molecular methods for the detection of specific bacteria in the environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent developments in molecular detection techniques have greatly increased the ability to track microorganisms and engineered genetic markers in natural environments (Pickup 1991). Molecular biology techniques that allow the detection of microorganisms in soil include the use of DNA probes (Holben et al 1988), polymerase chain reaction (Steffan and Atlas 1988;Ruppel et al 2006), use of selective markers such as antibiotic resistance genes, and the use of chromogenic markers such as b-galactosidase (Drahos et al 1986) and b-glucuronidase (Jefferson 1989).…”
Section: Molecular Monitoring Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments in molecular detection techniques have greatly increased the ability to track microorganisms and engineered genetic markers in natural environments (Pickup 1991). Molecular biology techniques that allow the detection of microorganisms in soil include the use of DNA probes (Holben et al 1988), polymerase chain reaction (Steffan and Atlas 1988;Ruppel et al 2006), use of selective markers such as antibiotic resistance genes, and the use of chromogenic markers such as b-galactosidase (Drahos et al 1986) and b-glucuronidase (Jefferson 1989).…”
Section: Molecular Monitoring Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This classical approach, however, is hampered by the lack of information on appropriate culture conditions for many of the micro-organisms. Earlier studies indicate that only about 10% of a population is cultivable (Jones, 1977;Hoppe, 1978;Ferguson e t al., 1984;Atlas, 1983;Pickup, 1991). Recently, comparative sequence analysis of ribosomal RNA has been widely accepted as a tool for the identification and phylogenetic classification of bacteria (Woese e t al., 1985;Olsen e t al., 1986;Woese, 1987;Winker & Woese, 1991;Fox e t al., 1992 Comparative 16s rRNA sequence analysis has been applied to studies of natural microbial communities and has resulted in the discovery of unexpectedly high levels of biodiversity Weller & Ward, 1989;Giovannoni e t al., 1990;Amann e t al., 1991 ;Schmidt et al, 1991 ;Fuhrman e t al., 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mostsuitable rapid detection systems are based on detection of marker genes using nucleic acid probes or on immunological detection (Pickup, 1991). More and more nucleic acid probes are being described for the detection of L. monocytogenes but they are not always suited to large-scale use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%