2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of nanohybrid adsorbent for defluoridation from aqueous systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Akinyemi, & Msagati, 2018), organic matter-rich clay (Mobarak, Selim, Mohamed, & Seliem, 2018), have been used previously for defluoridation. Various rare metaloxides/hydroxides composites, such as Ca-Al-La (Xiang, Zhang, Zhang, Tang, & Wang, 2014), Zr-Al-Ca (Dhongde, Wasewar, & De, 2017), and metal with chitosan composites such as Fe-chitosan (Viswanathan & Meenakshi, 2008), Al-chitosan (Swain et al, 2009), Carboxylated chitosan modified ferromagnetic nano particles (Mohammadi et al, 2019), bionanomaterial scaffolds (Kumar, Paul, & Natraj, 2017), La +3 impregnated chitosan/β-cyclodextrin (Preethi & Meenakshi, 2018) have also been investigated as fluoride scavenging materials.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Akinyemi, & Msagati, 2018), organic matter-rich clay (Mobarak, Selim, Mohamed, & Seliem, 2018), have been used previously for defluoridation. Various rare metaloxides/hydroxides composites, such as Ca-Al-La (Xiang, Zhang, Zhang, Tang, & Wang, 2014), Zr-Al-Ca (Dhongde, Wasewar, & De, 2017), and metal with chitosan composites such as Fe-chitosan (Viswanathan & Meenakshi, 2008), Al-chitosan (Swain et al, 2009), Carboxylated chitosan modified ferromagnetic nano particles (Mohammadi et al, 2019), bionanomaterial scaffolds (Kumar, Paul, & Natraj, 2017), La +3 impregnated chitosan/β-cyclodextrin (Preethi & Meenakshi, 2018) have also been investigated as fluoride scavenging materials.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercial carboxylic acid recovery from an aqueous system is performed by several prevalent techniques, such as extractive distillation, azeotropic distillation, reverse osmosis, adsorption, ion exchange, and membrane separation process. [17][18][19][20][21][22] However, reactive extraction is proven to be a potential recovery/separation method for carboxylic acids like protocatechuic acid, [23,24] tartaric acid, [25] lactic acid, [26] levulinic acid, [27] caproic acid, [28,29] acrylic acid, [30] gallic acid, [31,32] phenylacetic acid, [33,34] itaconic acid, [35] nicotinic acid, [36][37][38] and propionic acid [39] by utilizing tri-n-butyl phosphate (TBP), alamine, tri-n-octyl phosphine oxide, trioctylamine (TOA), aliquat, etc. as extractants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques have been employed for the separation of dilute acids from fermentation broth, namely, distillation, ultrafiltration and membrane separation, , ion exchange, adsorption, electrodialysis, and extraction . Most of these methods have limitations such as being time-consuming and/or energy intensive, producing toxic byproducts, exhibiting low selectivity, and being less effective for dilute solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%