This work presents a review of the current literature regarding the CO tolerance on PEM fuel cells feed with H 2 containing CO. From bulk metal alloys to nanoparticles, we summarize the present understanding of what is necessary to achieve the CO tolerance. A discussion is given on the tolerance mechanisms for binary Pt-alloys, emphasizing the achievements gained by using coupled techniques such as X-ray absorption spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. Together with the commonly accepted CO tolerance mechanisms, the so-called bifunctional and electronic mechanisms, alternative chemical pathways are presented as reactions that consume gas-phase CO and the role of such tolerance methods is assessed on the overall cell performance. A brief discussion on the perspective electrocatalysts and improved CO tolerance methods is given to account for the CO tolerance at higher CO contents in the H 2 stream, emphasizing the various ways to increase tolerance, whether by oxidation, reduction, or by changes in the CO adsorption/desorption properties.Proton exchange membrane fuel cells working with pure hydrogen fuel present very low anode overpotentials because of the very fast hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR). However, if the hydrogen fed to the PEMFC is obtained by the steam reform of methanol, natural gas, or gasoline [1, 2], CO is naturally produced as a by-product, hence strongly poisoning the common Pt-based electrocatalyst used in the anode [3][4][5], greatly increasing the reaction overpotential. Therefore, understanding the CO poisoning mechanisms and eliminating its effect is of fundamental importance in electrocatalysis. CO tolerance studies are usually based on the ability of a given material to electro-oxidize H 2 in the presence of CO with an acceptable polarization loss.Considering that reversible potential for the CO electrooxidation is approximately 0.0 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), in theory the CO should be promptly removed from the surface at this potential along the H 2 oxidation process. However, the strong adsorption of this molecule on transition metals shifts positively, in a few hundred millivolts, the reversible potential for this reaction [6], hence making the CO removal step difficult.Studies on polycrystalline platinum at 25°C indicate that CO poisoning is due to its strong adsorption on the catalyst surface, blocking the surface active sites for H 2 adsorption and electro-oxidation. Under these circumstances, the H 2 oxidation current will originate on the surface vacancies present on the CO layer. Kinetic analyses have shown that the CO poisoning effect occurs through a free Pt site attack mechanism, involving essentially two kinds of adsorbed CO [3,5,7,8]: linear adsorbed (Eq. 1) through 5σ and 2π* orbitals overlapping with the Pt 5d surface states, where the π orbitals are involved in the back-donation process; and by bridge-type adsorption (Eq. 2), in which most likely σ bondings are involved with two neighbor Pt sites.2Pt þ CO ! Pt 2 À CO