2019
DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2019.1605318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of New Ground Motion Prediction Equation for the North and Central Himalayas Using Recorded Strong Motion Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From Table 7, it can be seen that the seismic parameters, a and b, obtained from the present study, compare well with the values reported by others (NDMA 2010; Sharma and Malik 2006;and Bahuguna and Sil 2020). For SSS in the present study, the PGA values corresponding to return periods of 475, 950, and 2475 years, obtained using GMPE (Ramkrishnan et al 2020, Jain et al 2000, are in the range of 0.14-0.69g, 0.17-0.86g, and 0.22-0.93g, respectively. The calculated PGA values for some selected cities in the region are compared with those from previous studies as shown in Table 8.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From Table 7, it can be seen that the seismic parameters, a and b, obtained from the present study, compare well with the values reported by others (NDMA 2010; Sharma and Malik 2006;and Bahuguna and Sil 2020). For SSS in the present study, the PGA values corresponding to return periods of 475, 950, and 2475 years, obtained using GMPE (Ramkrishnan et al 2020, Jain et al 2000, are in the range of 0.14-0.69g, 0.17-0.86g, and 0.22-0.93g, respectively. The calculated PGA values for some selected cities in the region are compared with those from previous studies as shown in Table 8.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For focal depths greater than 45 km, the PGA values given by the JAIN2000 model lies in the range of observed values, and for lesser depth, the RAMK2020 model is found to be more appropriate. Therefore, in the present study, GMPEs RAMK2020 (Ramkrishnan et al 2020) is adopted for seismic source zones with an average focal depth of less than 45 km and JAIN2000 (Jain et al 2000) is adopted for seismic source zones with an average focal depth greater than or equal to 45 km, respectively. with SE = 0.59…”
Section: Ground Motion Prediction Equation (Gmpe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharma et al [2] provided GMM based on earthquake data for the Himalayan region, which is an active inter-plate region. Ramkrishnan et al [3] generated GMM for the north and central Himalayan region using actual earthquake record data. Bajaj and Anbazhagan [4] provided attenuation relations for the active region using limited strong ground motion data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These calculations are known as attenuation relationships, and they express ground motion as a function of distance and magnitude, as well as other variables like faulting type [2]. In the past, such relationships have been developed for numerous locations of the world [3,4,[13][14][15][16][17][18][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Most of these studies use regression analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FIGURE13 Variation of PGA obtained by existing relationship and developed ANN model for NGA-West2 database for V s30 = 760 m/s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%