1973
DOI: 10.3758/bf03334361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of open-field activity in the rat following caudate lesions in infancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

1974
1974
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other investigators have reported increased activity following dorsal caudate lesions in males (Baettig, 1963;Johnson & Becker, 1973;Kirkby, 1973;Schmaltz & Isaacson, 1972;Whittier & Orr, 1962), and our failure to observe comparable effects may seem surprising. Three factors may account for this discrepancy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several other investigators have reported increased activity following dorsal caudate lesions in males (Baettig, 1963;Johnson & Becker, 1973;Kirkby, 1973;Schmaltz & Isaacson, 1972;Whittier & Orr, 1962), and our failure to observe comparable effects may seem surprising. Three factors may account for this discrepancy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Finally, differences in lesion size and location are probably important; for example, the lesions in the Kirkby (1973) experiment were larger than in ours and also tended to be laterally asymmetrical. Lesion symmetry could be important because Johnson and Becker (1973) reported that unilateral caudate lesions were more effective than bilateral lesions in increasing open-field activity. Kemble et al (1976) reported that dorsal caudate lesions depressed rearing by male rats during open-field tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some sparing has been reported after damage during infancy to the hippocampus (Isaacson et al, 1968;Molino, 1975) and to the ventromedial hypothalamus (Bernardis & Frohman, 1970Frohman & Bernardis, 1968;Green, 1967), but many functions associated with these structures are totally disrupted by early damage. There has been no discernible advantage attributable to infantile destruction of the caudate nucleus (Goldman & Rosvold, 1972;Johnson & Becker, 1973), the septal area (Johnson, 1972;Molino, 1975), the lateral hypothalamus (Almli & Golden, 1974), or the dorsomedial nucleus of the thalamus (Goldman, 1974). The absence in the present study of any preferential recovery after removal of the amygdala during infancy thus is consistent with a growing body of literature which suggests that subcortical brain damage in infancy typically results in little sparing of function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%