2014
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of parallel miniature bubble column bioreactors for fermentation process

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In recent years, bioprocess development has been used scaled down bioreactors, parallel operation and on-line monitoring. In this study novel miniature bubble column bioreactors (MBCRs) have been developed. Reproducibility of the bioreactors, the effect of operational parameters and scale up to a conventional STR were studied. RESULTS: Fermentations in the parallel MBCRs were reproducible under the same conditions. Increasing the aeration rate had an insufficient effect on the specific growth rate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values were comparable to the k L a values of other MBRs or miniaturized systems described in literature(Bolic et al, 2016;Doig, Diep, & Baganz, 2005;Doig, Ortiz-Ochoa, Ward, & Baganz, 2005;Kheradmandnia, Hashemi-Najafabadi, Shojaosadati, Mousavi, & Malek Khosravi, 2015;Kirk et al, 2016;Lladó Maldonado et al, 2018;Peterat et al, 2014;Weuster-Botz, Altenbach-Rehm, & Hawrylenko, 2001). The k L a was measured in triplicate via the dynamic gassing-out method (Figure 6) using the air flow rate applied during cultivation, resulting in a value of 204 1/hr with an OTR max of 48 mmol/(L·hr).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These values were comparable to the k L a values of other MBRs or miniaturized systems described in literature(Bolic et al, 2016;Doig, Diep, & Baganz, 2005;Doig, Ortiz-Ochoa, Ward, & Baganz, 2005;Kheradmandnia, Hashemi-Najafabadi, Shojaosadati, Mousavi, & Malek Khosravi, 2015;Kirk et al, 2016;Lladó Maldonado et al, 2018;Peterat et al, 2014;Weuster-Botz, Altenbach-Rehm, & Hawrylenko, 2001). The k L a was measured in triplicate via the dynamic gassing-out method (Figure 6) using the air flow rate applied during cultivation, resulting in a value of 204 1/hr with an OTR max of 48 mmol/(L·hr).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The k L a was measured in triplicate via the dynamic gassing-out method (Figure 6) using the air flow rate applied during cultivation, resulting in a value of 204 1/hr with an OTR max of 48 mmol/(L·hr). These values were comparable to the k L a values of other MBRs or miniaturized systems described in literature(Bolic et al, 2016;Doig, Diep, & Baganz, 2005;Doig, Ortiz-Ochoa, Ward, & Baganz, 2005;Kheradmandnia, Hashemi-Najafabadi, Shojaosadati, Mousavi, & Malek Khosravi, 2015;Kirk et al, 2016;Lladó Maldonado et al, 2018;Peterat et al, 2014;Weuster-Botz, Altenbach-Rehm, & Hawrylenko, 2001).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…37,73 The highest comparable oxygen transfer was reported for a 20 mL miniaturized bubble column with oxygen transfer of 800/hr. 74 Conclusively, both outranging mixing time and oxygen transfer rates can be achieved in MBRs applying the here presented vertical oscillation technique. As a result, new operation windows are available enabling broad new biotechnological applications.…”
Section: Outranging Mixing Times and Oxygen Transfer Rates Can Be Amentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Applying higher liquid volumes >1 mL, shaken microtiter plates with specifically designed baffle structures for increased oxygen transfer were shown to achieve k L a ‐values of ≤460/hr . The highest comparable oxygen transfer was reported for a 20 mL miniaturized bubble column with oxygen transfer of 800/hr …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of MiBRs have received increasing attention from acedemia and industry. To date, MiBRs have been applied in various research areas particularly on process development of biotechnology fermentation processes (Kheradmandnia et al, 2014). Clearly, MiBRs have the advantage in reducing the fermentation development time offer a less laborious operations, inexpensive to work with and enables in situ evaluation of process change for an existing operation (Schmideder et al, 2015).…”
Section: Bioreactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%