2017 ASEE Annual Conference &Amp; Exposition Proceedings
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--28175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Perceptions of Technical and Ethical Expertise In Teams Over Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prevent phenomena like the findings of Zhu [8] and Schulz-Hardt, Frey, Luthgens, and Moscovici [7] it is important to identify in-groups in order to merge them promptly. As such, this study utilizes methodologies such as social network analysis and statistical computation of selfreported, rank-order survey data collected by Kenny Feister, Zoltowski, Buzzanell, Torres [10] to classify in-groups. We hypothesized that by constructing a sociogram composed of participants' demographic data and participants' reported perceptions of and willingness to depend on their classmates technical, project-specific, and ethical competencies in-groups will be visually identified through tie reciprocity.…”
Section: Interruption Of Knowledge Sharing In Interdisciplinary Organmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent phenomena like the findings of Zhu [8] and Schulz-Hardt, Frey, Luthgens, and Moscovici [7] it is important to identify in-groups in order to merge them promptly. As such, this study utilizes methodologies such as social network analysis and statistical computation of selfreported, rank-order survey data collected by Kenny Feister, Zoltowski, Buzzanell, Torres [10] to classify in-groups. We hypothesized that by constructing a sociogram composed of participants' demographic data and participants' reported perceptions of and willingness to depend on their classmates technical, project-specific, and ethical competencies in-groups will be visually identified through tie reciprocity.…”
Section: Interruption Of Knowledge Sharing In Interdisciplinary Organmentioning
confidence: 99%