2010
DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.5.730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Predictive Growth Models for Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus on Various Food Matrices Consisting of Ready-to-Eat (RTE) Foods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous study, S. aureus growth was also more delayed in sliced bread (pH: 7.66, a W : 0.95, salt: 0.17%) than cooked rice at all tested temperatures (Kang et al . ). This indicates that preservatives in the bread may affect the growth of S. aureus as well as prevent SE production during storage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In our previous study, S. aureus growth was also more delayed in sliced bread (pH: 7.66, a W : 0.95, salt: 0.17%) than cooked rice at all tested temperatures (Kang et al . ). This indicates that preservatives in the bread may affect the growth of S. aureus as well as prevent SE production during storage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The current guideline for refrigerated food is not appropriate for B. cereus contamination in tofu because 10 °C is the boundary temperature of growth and death of B. cereus in tofu, as shown in the present study. It has also been reported that S. aureus can grow at 8 °C [26], while the growth of L. monocytogenes was observed at 4 °C [27] in tofu. To prevent the growth of pathogenic bacteria in tofu at the retail market, careful monitoring of distribution temperature for refrigerated foods, including tofu, is needed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ross (1996) suggested that A f values larger than 1.000 were associated with a less accurate average estimate. In addition, Kang et al (2010) concluded that A f values ranging from 1.04 to 1.25 were in the acceptable level. In our study, the obtained A f values varied; while one showed a A f of less than 1.25 in an acceptable range, another showed a A f of more than 1.25.…”
Section: Model Performancementioning
confidence: 96%