2016
DOI: 10.20450/mjcce.2016.893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of procedure for the assessment of cognitive complexity of stoichiometric tasks

Abstract: The aim of this study was the creation of a procedure for determining the cognitive complexity of stoichiometric tasks and its validation. The created procedure included an assessment of the difficulty of concepts and skills, and an assessment of the concepts' interactivity. There were 82 students who participated in the study, with an educational profile of a pharmaceutical technician. As a research instrument for assessing performance, test of knowledge was used. Each task in the test was followed by a seven… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students' achievement showed a negative correlation with cognitive complexity, while, on the other hand, the correlation of self-invested mental effort with cognitive complexity is positive (Pollock, Chandler & Sweller, 2002;Schmeck et al, 2015). This is in agreement with previous research (Horvat et al, 2016(Horvat et al, , 2017Knaus et al, 2011;Raker et al, 2013). Therefore, it is considered that the design of the Table provides an assessment of the difficulty of concepts represented in problem tasks in the domain of chemical technology, which then allows teachers to dimension the cognitive complexity of the problem more easily, contributing to the fact that teachers have greater control over the gradual complexity of the problem, then mastering concepts by students, taking into account not to exceed the working memory capacity of the respondents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Students' achievement showed a negative correlation with cognitive complexity, while, on the other hand, the correlation of self-invested mental effort with cognitive complexity is positive (Pollock, Chandler & Sweller, 2002;Schmeck et al, 2015). This is in agreement with previous research (Horvat et al, 2016(Horvat et al, , 2017Knaus et al, 2011;Raker et al, 2013). Therefore, it is considered that the design of the Table provides an assessment of the difficulty of concepts represented in problem tasks in the domain of chemical technology, which then allows teachers to dimension the cognitive complexity of the problem more easily, contributing to the fact that teachers have greater control over the gradual complexity of the problem, then mastering concepts by students, taking into account not to exceed the working memory capacity of the respondents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…With increasing of the cognitive complexity of the task, students invested more mental effort to complete the task, which is fully consistent with the results obtained by others (Horvat et al, 2016(Horvat et al, , 2017Knaus et al, 2011;Raker et al, 2013). Optimization of the cognitive complexity of tasks, or specifically designing procedure to design tasks of appropriate cognitive complexity, reduces requirements for information processing because information thus is processed through selective processing (Halford, Wilson, & Phillips, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations