2020
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of pulmonary embolism in a nonhospitalized patient with COVID-19 who did not receive venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

Abstract: Disclaimer In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is better to suggest that there may be a potential risk of VTE even in COVID-19 outpatients and not only critically ill patients. Other reports support our findings [ 11 - 12 ]. Although the prophylactic dose is not recommended in non-hospitalized patients [ 10 ], we suggest that outpatients with COVID-19, especially those with reduced mobility, should be regularly contacted and well informed about the possible risk of VTE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, it is better to suggest that there may be a potential risk of VTE even in COVID-19 outpatients and not only critically ill patients. Other reports support our findings [ 11 - 12 ]. Although the prophylactic dose is not recommended in non-hospitalized patients [ 10 ], we suggest that outpatients with COVID-19, especially those with reduced mobility, should be regularly contacted and well informed about the possible risk of VTE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Due to the small numbers taking anticoagulation other than enoxaparin, conclusions regarding differences in the impact of specific anticoagulants could not be made. Current evidence for use of prophylactic anticoagulation in COVID-19 patients is predominantly based on observational studies of inpatient populations [ 29 ], though incidence of pulmonary embolism even in non-hospitalized asymptomatic COVID-19 patients without other predisposing factors for thrombosis suggests that even outpatients could potentially benefit from anticoagulation [ 30 , 31 ]. We found only one anticoagulation study in the LTCF population, a retrospective multi-center case series of 101 Dutch nursing home residents, that reported no significant evidence of mortality benefit with use of oral antithrombotic therapy [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case fatality rate for unselected patients is approximately 2.3% nationally. It was also assumed that most, but not all thromboembolic events and deaths might occur after hospitalization ( 44 , 45 , 46 ).…”
Section: Statistical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%