2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0273-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of python-FALL3D: a modified procedure for modelling volcanic ash dispersal in the Asia-Pacific region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simpson et al 2011). Quantitative approaches have typically considered a single source or site of interest at a local scale with any determined probabilities conditional on an eruption from that volcano occurring (Bonadonna et al 2005;Jenkins et al 2008;Costa et al 2009;Folch and Sulpizio 2010;Bear-Crozier et al 2012). Jenkins et al (2012a;2012b) developed a probabilistic framework for assessing ash fall hazard on a regional-scale (100's of km) by upscaling the ASHFALL dispersion model for regionalscale applications (Hurst 1994;Hurst and Turner 1999).…”
Section: Previous Probabilistic Ash Hazard Assessments In the Asia-pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simpson et al 2011). Quantitative approaches have typically considered a single source or site of interest at a local scale with any determined probabilities conditional on an eruption from that volcano occurring (Bonadonna et al 2005;Jenkins et al 2008;Costa et al 2009;Folch and Sulpizio 2010;Bear-Crozier et al 2012). Jenkins et al (2012a;2012b) developed a probabilistic framework for assessing ash fall hazard on a regional-scale (100's of km) by upscaling the ASHFALL dispersion model for regionalscale applications (Hurst 1994;Hurst and Turner 1999).…”
Section: Previous Probabilistic Ash Hazard Assessments In the Asia-pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Campi Flegrei, Italy (Costa et al 2009); Gunung Gede, Indonesia (Bear-Crozier et al 2012); Okataina, New Zealand (Jenkins et al 2008); Somma-Vesuvio, Italy (Folch and Sulpizio 2010) and Tarawera, New Zealand (Bonadonna and Houghton 2005). Numerical simulations of volcanic ash fallout generally involve running a deterministic eruptive scenario that represents the most likely event (based on historical investigation and/or modern analogues) over a period of time sufficiently large as to capture all possible meteorological conditions (Magill et al 2006;Folch et al 2008a;Folch et al 2008b;Folch and Sulpizio 2010;Bear-Crozier et al 2012) Regional-scale probabilistic volcanic ash hazard assessments are less common (Yokoyama et al 1984;Hoblitt et al 1987;Hurst 1994;Hurst and Turner 1999;Magill et al 2006;Ewert 2007). (Jenkins et al 2012a;Jenkins et al 2012b) employed a stochastic simulation technique that up-scales implementation of the ash dispersal model ASHFALL for regional-scale assessments (Hurst 1994;Hurst and Turner 1999).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous approaches have been adopted in the past to assess volcanic ash hazard at the local-scale (10s km) including observational, statistical, deterministic and probabilistic techniques (Bonadonna et al 2002a;Bonadonna et al 2002b;Blong 2003;Bonadonna and Houghton 2005;Costa et al 2006;Magill et al 2006;Jenkins et al 2008;Costa et al 2009;Folch et al 2009;Folch and Sulpizio 2010;Simpson et al 2011;Bear-Crozier et al 2012;Jenkins et al 2012a;Jenkins et al 2012b). However, incomplete historical data on the magnitude and frequency of eruptions worldwide and the difficulties associated with upscaling computationally intensive volcanic ash dispersal models have limited regional or global scale assessments (100 s km).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TephraProb package aligns with recent efforts to bridge gaps between academic and operational contexts (Bartolini et al 2013;Bear-Crozier et al 2012;Felpeto et al 2007). It provides a set of flexible tools for the assessment of tephra hazard and designed to compile comprehensive assessments in a wide range of conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%