Development of Restorative Justice in China: Theory and Practice

Abstract

Restorative justice has become a global social movement for criminal justice reform, with over eighty countries adopting some form of restorative justice program to tackle their crime problems. The theory of restorative justice was introduced to the Chinese academia in 2002. So far, various restorative justice programs have been developed in China. This paper aims to systematically review the development of restorative justice in China by analyzing academic literature on restorative justice and key legislative documentations. Major debates in restorative justice among Chinese scholars and a review of the indigenous restorative justice practice, criminal reconciliation (Xingshi Hejie), are provided. The study also analyzes the impetus of this soaring popularity of restorative justice in China, considering the macro social, political and legal background. Last but not least, a review of the major evaluation studies of current programs reveals that little is known about the process of various restorative justice programs from the parties' own perspective. KeywordsRestorative justice; literature review; criminal reconciliation; China. Please cite this article as:

Restorative Diversion of Children in Conflict with the Law in Yogyakarta: An Analysis of Democracy, Trust, Citizenship

“…The restorative concept relates to three events, namely encounters that are inclusive and concentrate on rights; second, reparative for losses that arise; and third, transformation in forming a healthy relationship. Therefore, restorative justice is pursued by bringing together impacted parties with those who are considered to have encouraged or caused the loss (Shen, 2016). In the restorative process, the fundamental value is desired to achieve equal opportunities for perpetrators and victims.…”

How Restorative are You? Introducing the Restorative Index

“…Voluntariness refers to the idea that essential people are free to choose whether they participate in restorative justice processes. Fundamentally, RJ philosophy calls for total voluntariness, where all participants decide for themselves whether they will participate in the processes (Kuhlmann & Kury, 2018;Shen, 2016;VanNess & Strong, 2015;Yazzie, 1996;Zehr, 2015a). However, especially in Western implementations of restorative justice with youthful offenders or within established punitive systems, some level of coercion exists in efforts to engage parties and to enforce agreements (Gavrielides, 2008;Geeraets, 2016).…”

“…Restorative dialogue asks questions specific to the harm experienced by the parties. Often, questions center on the thoughts of each party as the harm occurred, the thoughts of the parties after some time has passed since the harm, what each party believes needs to happen to repair the harm, what supports the parties need or can offer to repair the harm, and other questions relevant to harms and needs, obligations, and relationships (Daly, 2015;Muhammad, 2019;Shen, 2016;Wadhwa, 2020;Winslade, 2019;Yazzie, 1996;Zehr, 2015aZehr, , 2015b. Sometimes referred to as storytelling, use of restorative dialogue keeps the conversations focused on restorative goals such as developing a common understanding of the harm that occurred or arriving at a validation of participants' cultures and values.…”