2000
DOI: 10.5985/jec.10.841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Sampling Method for Dioxins and Related Compounds in Water by Coagulant.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] Major extraction techniques currently used for the analysis of PCDD/F in aqueous samples, in particular, drinking water samples, are solid-phase extraction (SPE), liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), glass fiber filter (GFF) extraction and large volume filtration using polyurethane foam (PUF) plugs. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] In terms of extraction time and solvent waste generated, conventional LLE is applicable only to small sample volume, often in the range of <1 to 10 L. 11 Thus, the use of LLE is suitable for wastewater matrices or cooling water from waste incinerators, which contain high concentrations of pollutants. The LLE has other disadvantages, such as formation of emulsions, which often decreases the accuracy and precision of analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Major extraction techniques currently used for the analysis of PCDD/F in aqueous samples, in particular, drinking water samples, are solid-phase extraction (SPE), liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), glass fiber filter (GFF) extraction and large volume filtration using polyurethane foam (PUF) plugs. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] In terms of extraction time and solvent waste generated, conventional LLE is applicable only to small sample volume, often in the range of <1 to 10 L. 11 Thus, the use of LLE is suitable for wastewater matrices or cooling water from waste incinerators, which contain high concentrations of pollutants. The LLE has other disadvantages, such as formation of emulsions, which often decreases the accuracy and precision of analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%