2018
DOI: 10.1111/1541-4329.12127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Scientific Thinking Facilitated by Reflective Self‐Assessment in a Communication‐Intensive Food Science and Human Nutrition Course

Abstract: A one-credit seminar on controversies in food science and human nutrition was a platform to introduce students to learning frameworks for thinking-like-a-scientist. We hypothesized that explicitly engaging students in thinking about their thinking abilities within these frameworks would enhance their self-perception of scientific thinking, an important general ability for food scientists. Our objectives were to assess thinking-like-a-scientist using a student self-assessment survey, and analyze their self-refl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Self‐assessment should help students to think about and practice thinking‐like‐a scientist, as reported by Hendrich et al. (). This progress assessment chart was used for grading.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Self‐assessment should help students to think about and practice thinking‐like‐a scientist, as reported by Hendrich et al. (). This progress assessment chart was used for grading.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The meaning of inquiry learning has not been understood and the benefits have not been recognized, therefore the implementation of inquiry learning does not create any improvement of the quality of science education in Indonesia (Rustaman, 2005). Another opinion mentioned that students interpret scientific thought as something that happened in the lab, not as something that has value in everyday life such as decision-making or solving a problem (Hendrich, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%