“…All these quality indicators during the period of sweetpotato roots storage were investigated by NIR analysis and a rapid and reagent-independent approach was expected to be developed as a alternative tool, and the specific results are summarized and shown in Appendix. Through comparative analysis, it was observed that the vast majority of indicators of sweetpotato roots were well evaluated by linear calibration algorithms (PLS & MLR) with R 2 P larger than 0.80 ( Magwaza, Naidoo, Laurie, Laing, & Shimelis, 2016 ; Su & Sun, 2017a ; Bu, Li, & Yan, 2018 ; Bu et al, 2018 ; Tian, Huang, Bai, Lv, & Sun, 2019 ; Tian et al, 2021 ; He et al, 2022 ; Xiao et al, 2022 ; He et al, 2023 ; Tang et al, 2023 ; He et al, 2023 ; He et al, 2023 ), while the maltose, cellulose, and minerals were poorly predicted ( Amankwaah et al, 2023 ; Lebot, Malapa, & Jung, 2013 ; Lebot, Ndiaye, & Malapa, 2011 ), which may due to the very small amounts of the three substances, as NIR sensor typically performs better in predicting substances with higher contents ( Porep, Kammerer, & Carle, 2015 ). In a few studies, only calibration datasets were applied for modeling, while no prediction datasets were provided, which meant that the reliability and robustness of the results had not been further verified ( Kamruzzaman & Villordon, 2022 ; Tang et al, 2013 ; Tang, Li, & Ma, 2008 ).…”