2017
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Social and Demographic Differences in Maternal Smoking Between 1999 and 2014 in Norway

Abstract: Women with low and medium education level and single mothers had the highest smoking prevalence and the lowest decline over the two time periods. These groups constitute 45% of our study population, the relatively high maternal smoking in these groups continues to be of public health concern for maternal and child health.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, we observed that smoking mothers used less folic acid supplements than non-smokers did ( Table 2). This may be related to an educational gradient in smoking habits (30) . Nearly half of women with pregestational diabetes were defined as supplement non-users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, we observed that smoking mothers used less folic acid supplements than non-smokers did ( Table 2). This may be related to an educational gradient in smoking habits (30) . Nearly half of women with pregestational diabetes were defined as supplement non-users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of pregnant smokers in Norway declined from 25% to 8% during the years 1999 to 2014 28 . Also mean placental weight and birthweight changed 29 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Age, parity and education have been indicated as possible determinants of smoking cessation in pregnancy (15,16). As the prevalence of snus use is rising while smoking is decreasing (12,13), we found the possibility to study also the tendency to quit tobacco in a time perspective important. Thus, we included the birth year of the newborn in the adjusted analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%