2017
DOI: 10.14303/ajfst.2017.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of sorghum-wheat composite bread and evaluation of nutritional, physical and sensory acceptability

Abstract: Increase in bread consumption, health awareness and demand for nutritious foods has necessitated research on composite bread to meet these needs. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolar L.) is nutritious, this study used a new sorghum genotype EUS130 in development of sorghum composite bread in the proportions wheat: sorghum flour 100:0 (Control), 96:4, 92;8, 88: and 84:16. Baking was done using Straight dough method. Nutrient content, shelf life, physical properties: height (dough strength), length (dough resistance to exte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bread produced using composite flours including 5%–15% wheat substitute has satisfactory functional and sensory characteristics (Ohimain, 2015). Moreover, beyond a 20% wheat flour replacement, mouthfeel, shelf‐life, crumb texture, hardness loaf volume, and appearance of breads were significantly impacted, leads to poor product (Kohajdová et al, 2013; Lucy, 2017; Mohammed et al, 2014). Gluten network development is reduced when wheat substitutes are introduced because of the various technical functions of the proteins and/or the interfering impact and water competition among gluten and fibers (Ferrero, 2017).…”
Section: Effect Of Alternatives On Functional and Sensory Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bread produced using composite flours including 5%–15% wheat substitute has satisfactory functional and sensory characteristics (Ohimain, 2015). Moreover, beyond a 20% wheat flour replacement, mouthfeel, shelf‐life, crumb texture, hardness loaf volume, and appearance of breads were significantly impacted, leads to poor product (Kohajdová et al, 2013; Lucy, 2017; Mohammed et al, 2014). Gluten network development is reduced when wheat substitutes are introduced because of the various technical functions of the proteins and/or the interfering impact and water competition among gluten and fibers (Ferrero, 2017).…”
Section: Effect Of Alternatives On Functional and Sensory Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%