2008
DOI: 10.1021/es702861u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Species Sensitivity Distributions for Wildlife using Interspecies Toxicity Correlation Models

Abstract: Species sensitivity distributions (SSD) are probability distributions of chemical toxicity of multiple species and have had limited application in wildlife risk assessment because of relatively small data sets of wildlife toxicity values. Interspecies correlation estimation (ICE) models predict the acute toxicity to untested taxa from known toxicity of a single surrogate species. ICE models were used to predict toxicity values to wildlife species and generate SSDs for 23 chemicals using four avian surrogates. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some efforts to extrapolate chemical sensitivity among species have already been made using species sensitivity distributions (SSDs; e.g., Awkerman et al 2008, Raimondo et al 2013) and interspecies correlation estimation (ICE; Raimondo et al 2010). ICE relies on pairwise comparisons of toxicity data for multiple chemicals (Raimondo et al 2010), and the results of this approach indicate that toxicity predictions are more accurate for more closely related species (Raimondo et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some efforts to extrapolate chemical sensitivity among species have already been made using species sensitivity distributions (SSDs; e.g., Awkerman et al 2008, Raimondo et al 2013) and interspecies correlation estimation (ICE; Raimondo et al 2010). ICE relies on pairwise comparisons of toxicity data for multiple chemicals (Raimondo et al 2010), and the results of this approach indicate that toxicity predictions are more accurate for more closely related species (Raimondo et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, if acute toxicity data for the different taxonomic species can be obtained by predictive models, PNECs can also be derived for chemicals with limited measured toxicity data. Recently, interspecies correlation estimation (ICE) statistical models have been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) as an attractive additional approach to estimate acute toxicity values from a single known toxicity value [19][20][21]. Based on acute toxicity values from surrogate species, the ICE model is a loglog correlation of multiple chemical toxicity values for a pair of species that can predict the toxicity of multiple species [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A speci fi ed effect level, such as the proportion of species expected to respond to a particular exposure for a speci fi c measurement endpoint, can be determined so that most species are protected. SSDs have been used to assess risk and develop water quality criteria for aquatic species (Caldwell et al 2008 ;Schuler et al 2008 ) , but have had limited application for wildlife because of the dearth of toxicity data for wildlife (Awkerman et al 2008 ) . In some studies, SSDs have been used to derive quality criteria to protect top predators from residues in soils Traas et al 1996 ) .…”
Section: Reasonableness Of Trvs and Trcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, SSDs have been used to derive quality criteria to protect top predators from residues in soils Traas et al 1996 ) . By incorporating interspecies toxicity correlation models, SSDs were developed for wildlife from toxicity data on 23 chemicals (Awkerman et al 2008 ) . SSDs created for 15 or more wildlife species could give accurate results, whereas data for approximately 7 species can be used to provide only an adequate estimate for some combinations of chemicals and species (Awkerman et al 2008 ) .…”
Section: Reasonableness Of Trvs and Trcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation