2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566)
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2004.1390030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of SPINEBOT for spine surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate screw insertion thus requires a smaller opening of the back [2,26]. We also tested variations of the procedure such as changing the entry point or the transverse angle of pedicle screws [9,16,17].…”
Section: Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accurate screw insertion thus requires a smaller opening of the back [2,26]. We also tested variations of the procedure such as changing the entry point or the transverse angle of pedicle screws [9,16,17].…”
Section: Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in surgical technology may reduce operation time, shorten recovery and interim pain, and by improving positional accuracy of tools, lead to better outcomes. Of the various methods proposed for spinal fusion [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], very few integrate the elements of computer-aided surgery (CAS) into a practical system [5,6]. These elements may include robots, image-based surgical planning methodology, and navigation tools to guide the robot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the real operation space is about 400 × 200 × 300 mm 3 , which is a narrow workspace for a moving robot. In this limited space, the traditional serial robot, such as Acorbot, AcuBot or SPINEBOT system [3][4][5], has difficulty completing such operations because of its large dimensions, the limited workspace and dexterity of the robot, the low stiffness of this kind of serial robot, and the accumulative errors of serial robots. The traditional parallel robot, such as the Stewart platform, also has difficulty implementing the minimally invasive operation in limited space because of the low dexterity or maneuverability, with which is difficult to meet the demand of puncturing route planning in CT-guided minimally invasive surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to relatively large incision, the patient's recovery time is longer than that of the MIS system. Chung et al also developed a serial-type manipulator (SPINEBOT) for the same purpose [8] [9]. Since it supports MIS scheme, the trauma and recovery time to the patient could be reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%