2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of statistical models for prediction of enteric methane emission from goats using nutrient composition and intake variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15% of gross energy (Johnson et al, 2007;Patra and Lalhriatpuii, 2016). In the present study, energy loss as CH4 (% GE) ranged between 8.8 and 9.6%; these values are comparable to those reported for beef cattle fed low-quality rations in tropical regions (Ym between 7-9%; Kaewpila andSommart, 2016, Molina et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15% of gross energy (Johnson et al, 2007;Patra and Lalhriatpuii, 2016). In the present study, energy loss as CH4 (% GE) ranged between 8.8 and 9.6%; these values are comparable to those reported for beef cattle fed low-quality rations in tropical regions (Ym between 7-9%; Kaewpila andSommart, 2016, Molina et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Livestock produces greenhouse gases such as nitrous oxide and methane; the latter has a warming potential 28 times higher than carbon dioxide and an increase of 86% has been predicted to occur over the next twenty years (Myhre et al, 2013). Production of methane during carbohydrate fermentation in the rumen represents an inefficiency in energy utilization at the whole-animal level (Millen et al, 2016;Patra & Lalhriatpuii, 2016) which negatively affects the economy of producers. Therefore, it is important to identify methods and strategies to find a balance between minimizing environmental impacts and intensifying animal productivity to meet requirements of animal protein by the world population (Roehe et al, 2016;Rojas-Downing et al, 2017;Richards et al, 2018) in the years to come.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several statistical models have been developed for buffaloes, goats, sheep, and tropical cattle (Table 1 ). These newly fitted models performed better than the IPCC ( 93 ) and FAO ( 1 ) models as the recently developed equations had lower RMSPE values compared with these extant models ( 95 ). These new models should be considered for accurate preparation of enteric CH 4 emission inventories for buffaloes, goats, sheep, and tropical cattle.…”
Section: Measurement Methods Of Ch 4 Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These new models should be considered for accurate preparation of enteric CH 4 emission inventories for buffaloes, goats, sheep, and tropical cattle. For example, Patra and Lalhriatpuii ( 95 ) showed that the estimates of CH 4 emission by goats were 5.23 and 5.15 kg/goat annually (actual CH 4 production was 5.22 kg/goat/year) using the equations based on gross energy intake and digestible energy intake for goats, respectively. The estimate of CH 4 emission using FAO ( 1 ) was 6.78 kg/goat/year, which was substantially greater than actual CH 4 production.…”
Section: Measurement Methods Of Ch 4 Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wilkerson et al (1995) found that CH4 emission in cattle ranged from 6% to 10%. Patra and Lalhriatpuii (2016) suggested that CH4 production is lower in goats than in cattle due to grater passage rate of feeds for goats than for cattle, and consequently low CH4 production per unit of feed intake for goats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%