2018
DOI: 10.1002/nme.6008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of stochastic isogeometric analysis (SIGA) method for uncertainty in shape

Abstract: In this paper, a new method is proposed that extend the classical deterministic isogeometric analysis (IGA) into a probabilistic analytical framework in order to evaluate the uncertainty in shape and aim to investigate a possible extension of IGA in the field of computational stochastic mechanics. Stochastic IGA (SIGA) method for uncertainty in shape is developed by employing the geometric characteristics of the non-uniform rational basis spline and the probability characteristics of polynomial chaos expansion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stochastic methods have been proposed to quantify uncertainty due to material randomness in linear elasticity [41,31], static analysis of plates [69], vibrational analysis of shells [44], static and dynamic structural analysis of random composite structures [15] and functionally graded plates [26,42,43]. In [71] a method is proposed to quantify the effect due to uncertainty in shape. Of these, the methods proposed in [41,42,43,44] use isogeometric analysis within a spectral stochastic finite element framework [20], which is based on a KL expansion of random fields.…”
Section: Challenges In Numerical Solution Of the Kle By Means Of The ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stochastic methods have been proposed to quantify uncertainty due to material randomness in linear elasticity [41,31], static analysis of plates [69], vibrational analysis of shells [44], static and dynamic structural analysis of random composite structures [15] and functionally graded plates [26,42,43]. In [71] a method is proposed to quantify the effect due to uncertainty in shape. Of these, the methods proposed in [41,42,43,44] use isogeometric analysis within a spectral stochastic finite element framework [20], which is based on a KL expansion of random fields.…”
Section: Challenges In Numerical Solution Of the Kle By Means Of The ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods in [15,26,69] use perturbation series of which [69] expands random fields in terms of the KLE. Standard polynomial chaos is used in [71], while the methods in [16], [31] and [56] discretize the stochastic dimensions in terms of splines. In particular, in [16] tensor product B-splines are used to expand stochastic variables, [31] proposes a spline-dimensional decomposition (SDD) and [56] proposes a spline chaos expansion, thus extending generalized polynomial chaos [70].…”
Section: Challenges In Numerical Solution Of the Kle By Means Of The ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the complexity of explicitly computing the matrix entries is bounded from below by the storage complexity. This bottleneck is greatly exacerbated in cases where IGA-based models are utilized within parametric studies, such as shape optimization [22,42,52,62], uncertainty quantification (UQ) for stochastic geometry deformations [24,63], or studies utilizing shape morphing techniques [64]. These parametric studies demand that multiple, often numerous, geometry configurations must be explored until an optimal shape or a statistical quantity of interest (QoI) can be estimated to sufficient accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shahrokhabadi and Vahedifard (2018) combined isogeometric and generation random fields of water in the soil to model seepage in unsaturated soils. Zhang and Shibutani (2019) used polynomial chaos expansions to construct SIGA for uncertainty in shape. Ding et al (2019) considered higher-order Taylor series of functions of random variables to propose the Isogeometric generalized nth order perturbation-based stochastic method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%